Monday at C of E General Synod: Women Bishops

http://www.evangelicals.org/news.asp?id=898

[EV News] 7 Jul 2008--In the afternoon the Synod began the debate on Women Bishops. Due to the large number of amendments a total of six hours of debate was allowed going up to 10pm. After the first four hours Synod had covered seven of the fourteen amendments. However, this represented the bulk of the difficult decisions.

The initial motion had been put by the House of Bishops which is sadly unrepresentative of the wider Church. Once they had put their motion it was going to be very difficult for any alternative to get through General Synod and this proved to be the case. Every amendment was voted on by houses and all bar one was lost. The motion that passed is important but not to do with provision.

The amendment which would have removed even a code of practice, so that there was no provision at all, was defeated but with over a third of the Synod voting in favour.

Motions which would have led to new Dioceses for those who cannot accept Women Bishops were defeated.

A motion from the Bishop of Leeds and Ripon which would have meant that the option of Transferred Episcopacy was explored in more detail for the February Synod alongside a code of practice was defeated in the House of Clergy. However, the majority of Synod members did vote for this amendment.

The evening session began early at 8pm and went on until 10.15pm. It became clear that a number of Synod members were aware that having disregarded what those seeking provision had said would be necessary they had created a problem and the tone of much of the evening was sombre. An amendment was passed to ensure that the code of practice would be statutory.

At a late stage the Bishop of Durham attempted to get the motion adjourned, but this failed by a narrow margin.

The vote on the final motion, which was very much as put in the first place by the House of Bishops was then approved by all three houses. However, once again, if this had been the Final Approval debate for the legislation it would not have gained the 2/3rd majority necessary in the House of Laity.

After the decision the Archbishop of York tried to say that the vote did not amount to a decision to kick traditionalists out of the Church of England. However, the fact that he said it indicates that is exactly how many will receive the decision.

In posting this article, I was struck by the similarity between what the proponents of women bishops in the C of E have been saying and what the proponents of openly gay bishops and same sex blessings said before the 2003 General Convention and the Robinson consecration. They maintained that votes in favor of the confirmation of Robinson and the approval of same sex blessings would have no appreciable effect upon the Episcopal Church. The proponents of women bishops have been saying the same thing. The events of the past 5 years have shown that the proponents of openly gay bishops and same sex blessings were wrong--indeed terribly wrong.