‘Why gay men do not have a right to sex with under-16s’

http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/index.php/2008/03/04/why-gay-men-do-not-have-a-right-to-sex-with-under-16s/#more-2905

[Anglican Mainstream] 4 Mar 2008--The ‘gay rights’ activist Peter Tatchell recently wrote: “Isn’t it time the lesbian and gay community said, loud and clear, that the under-16s also have sexual rights? Don’t we have a responsibility to defend the right of under-age queers to make their own free, informed choices about when they are ready for sex?”

He clarified that later by saying that yes, 14-year-old boys should, if they want, be allowed to have sex with 40-year-old men. Well, sorry, no.

Any heterosexual male who proposed such a notion for 14-year-old girls would be hounded into extinction; but Tatchell remains the hero of the left-libertine classes.

And that rather summarises the cultural and political power of the gay lobby.

A legal apartheid now means that homosexual men are allowed ‘freedoms’ denied the rest of us.
Entire parklands in British cities have now been requisitioned by what Tatchell calls ‘queers’ for nocturnal, casual sexual encounters.

Much the same is true of Dublin’s Phoenix Park.

I loathe both this, and many of the practices associated with the gay ’scene’, (as indeed do many homosexuals themselves).