I keep coming across articles on the internet in which the
writer is repeating a variation of the same theme—the important of church
attendance. But I must wonder whether the people at whom these articles are
directed—those people who have not yet returned to church—are reading these
articles. Are they even visiting the websites on which they are posted? Some
articles are almost panicky. Readers are admonished that they are not really
Christian if they do not regularly attend a church and so on.
I also have to wonder if we are going about it the wrong
way. One article to which I posted a link today points out that Generation Z
are going to avoid the websites that their parents frequent. If a writer’s aim
is to encourage young people in Generation Z to come back to church, he is
wasting his breath. They are not hearing his message. They are not going to
visit a website that their parents frequent. They are not going to pay
attention to a writer in their parents’ generation who posts on a website that
they frequent.
Rather than urging people to return to church maybe we
should be offering them help to be followers of Jesus wherever they are. In the
case of Generation Z, the ones offering the help should be members of
Generation Z.
Last Friday I posted an article on “Instavangelists,” social
media influencers on Instagram. YouTube and TikTok also have their influencers.
Facebook too. People are turning to these influencers for advice and direction,
not to pastors, not to priests. For one
reason they are more accessible. You often as not get an immediate response. To
get advice and direction from a pastor or a priest, you have to make an
appointment or go to what may prove a boring service and listen to what may
prove a boring sermon.
If we are honest with ourselves, church attendance is not
what some writers would have us believe. Some churchgoers may have friends at
church; others do not. Some churchgoers may be inspired by the songs and the
sermon; others are not. They find our church services to be flat, like a soda
or soft drink that has lost its fizz. These writers assume that everyone has
the same experience. We cannot make that assumption. Longtime churchgoers tend
to overlook their church’s shortcomings. To newcomers, however, they are glaringly
obvious.
While some writers keep telling Christians that we must get
out our buildings and go to where the people are—the workplaces, the
universities, the cafes, the bowling alleys, the gyms, and all the places where
people gather, we seem to be very much obsessed with people coming to us. I must
wonder whether we really understand what getting out of the building means. It
is not about venturing briefly into the world and then scampering back to the
safety of the building. It is about leaving the building and locking the door
so we cannot get back in. It means being what Jesus called his followers to be—his
church in the world and not our church in a building.
The early church did not have buildings. It met wherever it
could meet. The early church did not have organized service of worship. It did
not have Bibles, prayer books, hymnals, and priests. When it gathered, one
person shared a song that Holy Spirit had inspired, a second offered a word of
encouragement, a third person gave a talk on the faith and life of a Jesus
follower, a fourth person offered a testimony, a fifth person read passages
from a roll of Old Testament scripture, a gospel, or the latest letter
of the apostle Paul circulating among the churches, whatever the church
possessed, and so on. The term coined for this way of holding a church meeting
in the last century is “open worship.” Everyone present at the gathering contributed
in some way. They may have eaten together. From the bread and wine they had
brought for the meal some was set aside for the Lord’s Supper. One of those
present offered a prayer of thanksgiving and praise to God; the others added
their own prayers, and then the gathering shared the bread and wine in remembrance
of Jesus’s suffering and death.
When we take the church to the world, we will not stop
gathering together, but our gatherings will be smaller and less formal. Those
present at these gatherings will be Jesus followers, those exploring that
spiritual path, friends and acquaintances and others who came to the gathering
to check us out. Like the early church we will meet wherever we can. We may
meet in the full view of the world—in a cafĂ©, for example. We will not hide our
faith and way of life behind church doors. We will live it out in front of friends
and strangers.
Being Jesus’ church as I believe that he intended will
transform the church. We will stop talking about discipleship, about following
Jesus, and will start living out discipleship, really doing what we previously
only talked about. We will no longer be preoccupied with who shows up on Sunday
morning, but rather will be focused upon how we are impacting lives.