Reform UK Initial Response to Revision Committee Report

The Revision Committee’s report on Women in the Episcopate published on 8th May “provides no adequate framework for recognition of our future ministry in the Church of England and so could lead to a serious squeezing of the pipeline for future ordinands” said Revd Rod Thomas, Reform chairman today.

He continued: “It is very disappointing that the Committee, despite a lengthy discussion of the implications of these decisions, has voted to give no adequate statutory provision to those who cannot accept the oversight of a female bishop on Scriptural grounds.


“We very much hope that amendments will be made at July’s General Synod so that we are able to vote on a piece of legislation that seeks to include rather than exclude our ministries now and in the future.”

As evidence of the strength of feeling concerning this innovation, 100 Reform clergy have signed a letter sent to every bishop in advance of the House of Bishops’ meeting next week. This follows a similar letter signed by 50 of the clergy sent in February, and sets out why “the consecration of women bishops would be a mistake and would raise for us great difficulties of conscience and practice, as well as being wrong for our Church as a whole.”

A major practical consequence highlighted by the letter is the pipeline of future ordinands. The 100 churches represented by the letter have sent 286 men into ministry in the Church of England over the last 10 years, of whom 120 were under the age of 30. But these numbers would be seriously squeezed in the future, with Reform clergy encouraging young men to undertake training for ministries outside the Church of England’s formal structures, although within an Anglican tradition.

To read the letter sent to all the bishops, see below.

For further information contact: Revd Paul Dawson T: 07791 495824

Incumbents Letter

Wednesday 5th May 2010

Dear Bishops,

As active clergy within the Church of England we are writing to say why, in our view, the consecration of women bishops would be a mistake and would raise for us great difficulties of conscience and practice, as well as being wrong for our Church as a whole.

Our concern is derived from Scripture. It seems to us that the Apostolic teaching on male headship in church and family (as in 1 Corinthians 11-14, Ephesians 5, 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Peter 3) is clear enough in its principles: overall leadership in the church is to be exercised by men. This is not cultural, but a creation ordinance (1Tim 2:13) and rooted in the nature of God (1Cor 11:3). The fierce debates that have surrounded the gender issue over the last twenty years or so have stimulated much careful analysis of these texts, and have only served to show that mainstream translations such as NRSV, NIV, REB and ESV are correct in their translation and may (and should) be taken as they stand.

It is, of course, right to say that these passages in Paul and Peter have a particular cultural setting; but to make them prisoners of that culture and thus unable to challenge our culture, seems to us implicitly to deny the authority of Scripture. It is surely the genius of the New Testament that what was spoken in a particular context is at one and the same time also God’s word to us. Far from being a prisoner of his culture, Paul is not afraid to challenge it, warning his readers “not to live as the Gentiles do, in the futility of their thinking” (Eph 4:17). Why, then, is it assumed he will uncritically reflect their values on this issue of gender?

Therefore we think the historic, reasoned reflection of Christians down the ages (including the historic position of the Church of England) has been correct; we fear that the current pressure to overturn it comes not for biblical reasons but because we are losing our nerve in the face of pressure from society.

In saying all this, we emphasise again that we are NOT for a moment saying women are not equal to men, or are less valuable or are inferior and nor does the Scripture. This, in our experience, is the point which we find hardest to communicate, since the world about us equates value with power. Just by making this point we are thought to be “anti-women”. On the contrary, it is both possible and right to affirm that we are “all one in Christ Jesus”, while at the same time affirming different roles. For the Bible separates roles and worth: our Lord Jesus himself submitted to the Father, but is, of course, no less God than he is.

There are, of course, questions about how precisely to honour this teaching in some details of the life of our churches today, but few would doubt, surely, that the office of bishop is indeed very much a leadership function!

In our own churches we are glad to teach these passages of Scripture as they stand, and include a ‘complementary’ view of gender roles in our teaching on marriage, family life and church. Gently ordering our shared life this way is, in our view, vital to our witness to a Christian understanding of family life. Our churches contain many members - and very many women as well as men - who are glad of this teaching, which is all the more important in a world which is so confused about gender roles and sexuality in general. In such a context, the oversight of a woman bishop would be enormously hard to explain, however great her merits in other regards. Again and again, in our youth groups, at marriage preparation and whenever covering the relevant passages in homegroups and from the pulpit, we would find ourselves having to answer people’s question, “Why does the Church of England go against this?” This would fester on for as long as people have Bibles in their hands.

In the end, this is an issue about our view of Holy Scripture, and this is why it matters to us so much, as ministers of the Word.

As matters stand, it seems likely that General Synod will be invited to vote on legislative proposals that threaten our ministries. We fear this will significantly impact how we function as parish churches, as part of our Diocesan communities and not least as partners in the mission of ministry of the Church of England. An illustration of the practical problems we will face should a Measure fail to provide adequate safeguards, can be seen with future ordinands. At the moment we are encouraging young men into the ordained ministry in the knowledge that they cannot be discriminated against if they hold convictions about male headship. While this remains the case, we have encouraged them to believe that there is a worthwhile future for their ministries in the Church of England. However, we will be unable to do this if inadequately protective legislation is passed. The issue that will then arise is how to encourage these men to develop their ministries if they cannot do so within the formal structures of the Church of England. The answer must be to encourage them to undertake training for ministries outside those formal structures, although hopefully still within an Anglican tradition. We will, of course, have to help them with the financing of their training.

Many of our congregation will inevitably start asking questions about their own place within the Church of England if they see us encouraging people into training for alternative ministries. This will come into sharp focus when the issue of succession to an incumbency arises. Since we cannot take an oath of canonical obedience to a female bishop, we are unlikely to be appointed to future incumbencies. We see nothing but difficulty facing us. In these circumstances we will have to discuss with our congregations how to foster and protect the ministry they wish to receive. This may well generate a need for the creation of new independent charitable trusts whose purpose will be to finance our future ministries, when the need arises.

These twin developments will need to be financed from current congregational giving. This will inevitably put a severe strain on our ability to continue to contribute financially to Diocesan funds. Where we are unable to contribute as before some will see this as a form of retaliation. However, that could not be further from the truth. We long to contribute to the well being of the Church of England. Over the last ten years we have encouraged 286 people into the ordained ministry, 120 of whom were under the age of 30. We have together contributed a gross figure of over £38 million to Diocesan funds.

Finally, for those of us ordained since 1992, our understanding, in good faith, was that proper legal provision would be made for those who did not agree that women should have the overall leadership of a church (Resolution B, etc). It seems to us a matter of simple integrity that Synod should now keep its word to us in this and not force us down a road none of us wish to tread.

Yours in Christ,
Rev’d Rod Thomas St Matthew’s Elburton, Exeter
(Chairman of Reform)

Rev’d Michael Andreyev St Peters Stapenhill, Derby
Rev’d Canon George Ansah Emmanuel, West Dulwich, Southwark
Rev’d Mark Ashton St Andrews the Great, Ely
Rev’d Nigel Atkinson St John’s Knutsford, Chester
Rev’d Simon Austen St John’s and St Peter’s, Carlisle
Rev’d Martin Bailey All Saints Riseley, Peterborough
Rev’d Iain Baker St Thomas Kidsgrove, Lichfield
Rev’d Hugh Balfour Christ Church Peckham, Southwark
Rev’d David Banting St Peter’s Harold Wood, Chelmsford
Rev’d Neil Barber St Giles Normanton, Derby
Rev’d Robert Bashford St James Westgate,Canterbury
Rev’d Paul Baxendale St James Burton-in-Kendal and Holy Trinity Holme, Carlisle
Rev’d John Birchall Christ Church Surbiton Hill, Southwark
Rev’d David Bourne St Mary’s Hailsham, Chichester
Rev’d Matthew Brailsford All Saints North Ferriby, York
Rev’d Peter Breckwoldt Moulton Parish Church, Peterborough
Rev’d Iain Broomfield Christ Church Bromley, Rochester
Rev’d Mark Burkill Christ Church Leytonstone, Chelmsford
Rev’d Tony Cannon Kingham & Daylesford, Churchill with Sarsden, Oxford
Rev’d Jim Charles St Peter’s Bexleyheath, Rochester
Rev’d John Cheeseman Holy Trinity Eastbourne, Chichester
Rev’d Philip Coekin United Benefice of Emmanuel, Hastings, Chichester
Rev’d Edward Coombs St Paul’s Banbury, Oxford
Rev’d Tim Crook St Mary Magdalene South Bersted Chichester
Rev’d Dr Roger Curl St Mary’s Fulham
Rev’d Paul Darlington Holy Trinity, Oswestry, Lichfield
Rev’d Canon Tim Davies Christ Church Central, Sheffield
Rev’d CJ Davis St NicholasTooting, Southwark
Rev’d Robert Desics St Timothy's Hemlington, York
Rev’d Charles Dobbie Holy Trinity Lyonsdown, St Albans
Rev’d Steve Donald St John the Evangelist, Carlisle
Rev’d William Eardley St Withun’s Holmesfield, Derby
Rev’d Nigel Elliott St Mary’s Wombwell, Sheffield
Rev’d Jonny Elvin Trinity Church Exeter, Exeter
Rev’d Richard Espin-Bradley St Luke’s Wolverhampton, Birmingham
Rev’d Dick Farr Chairman of Church Society Trust, St John’s Tunbridge Wells, Rochester
Rev’d Dick Farr St John’s Tunbridge Wells, Rochester
Rev’d Jonathan Fletcher Emmanuel Church Wimbledon, Southwark
Rev’d John Fulton Hepworth, Hinderclay, Thelnetham & Wattisfield, St Edmundsbury and Ipswich
Rev’d Simon Gales St John s Lindow, Chester
Rev’d David Gibb St Andrews Leyland, Blackburn
Rev’d Ian Gilmour Holy Redeemer Streatham, Southwark
Rev’d John Hamilton St Andrew's, Sherborne St John
Rev’d Graham Hamilton St Peters Bovey Tracey, Exeter
Rev’d Tim Hanson Christ Church, Winsford, Chester Diocese
Rev’d David Harris St Leonards, Exeter
Rev’d Clive Hawkins St Mary’s Eastrop, Winchester
Rev’d Chris Hobbs St Stephen’s Selly Park, Birmingham
Rev’d Christopher Hobbs St Thomas Oakwood, London
Rev’d Jon Hobbs Maresfield & Nutley Churches
Rev’d Richard Hopkins Sileby, Cossington & Seagrave, Diocese of Leicester.
Rev’d James Hunt Blessed Mary and St Peter’s Bishops Waltham, Portsmouth
Rev’d Pete Jackson St Andrew’s Kendray, Sheffield
Rev’d Charles Jefferson St James Thrapston, Peterborough
Rev’d Jonathan Juckes St Andrew’s Kirk Ella, York
Rev’d Jeremy Leffler St Ambrose Widnes, Liverpool
Rev’d James Leggett St James, Ryde, Portsmouth
Rev’d Ian Lewis St Bartholomews, Bath
Rev’d Robert Lovatt All Saints Eastbourne, Chichester
Rev’d Mark Lucas St John's Church Polegate, Chichester
Rev’d Angus MacLeay St Nicholas Sevenoaks, Rochester
Rev’d Mark Madeley St John the Baptist Coley, Wakefield
Rev’d Julian Mann Oughtibridge Parish Church, Sheffield
Rev’d Bob Mason St James’ Poole, Salisbury
Rev’d David Mathers St Peter Thurston, St Edmundsbury and Ipswich
Rev’d Dafydd Meirion-Jones All Saints Preston, Blackburn
Rev’d Jonathan Milton-Thomson St Andrew's Church Livesey, Blackburn
Rev’d Ed Moll St George’s Wembdon, Bath
Rev’d Darren Moore St Catherine’s Tranmere, Chester
Rev’d Russell Moul St Paul’s Harold Hill, Chelmsford
Rev’d Ken Moulder St Oswalds, Newcastle
Rev’d Robert Munro Cheadle Parish Church, Chester
Rev’d Mike Neville All Saints Fordham & Eight Ash Green
Rev’d Alasdair Paine Christ Church Westbourne, Winchester
Rev’d Paul Perkin St Mark’s Battersea Rise, Southwark
Rev’d Venables Philip St Andrew’s Bebington,Chester
Rev’d Mark Pickles St Ackmund’s Duffield, Derby
Rev’d Frank Price St Matthew’s Cambridge
Rev’d Andrew Raynes Christ Church, Blackburn
Rev’d Mike Reith Dagenham Parish Church, Chelmsford
Rev’d Vaughan Roberts St Ebbe's, Oxford
Rev’d Simon Scott All Saints Little Shelford, Cambridge
Rev’d Robin Sewell St Paul’s Braintree, Chelmsford
Rev’d John Simmons Christ Church Chadderton, Manchester
Rev’d Simon Smallwood St George’s Dagenahm, Chelmsford
Rev’d Will Stileman St Mary’s Maidenhead, Oxford
Rev’d Canon Alan Strange Holy Trinity Norwich,
Rev’d Hugh Symes-Thomson St Peter & St Paul, Cranfield, St Albans
Rev’d William Taylor St Helen’s Bishopsgate, London
Rev’d Melvin Tinker St John's Newlands, York
Rev’d Peter Tizzard Christ Church Ramsgate
Rev’d Gary Townsend Henham, Elsenham and Ugley, Chelmsford
Rev’d Alistair Tresidder St Luke's Hampstead, London
Rev’d Giles Walter St John’s Tunbridge Wells, Rochester
Rev’d Stephen Walton St Michaels’s Marbury, Chester
Rev’d Tim Ward Holy Trinity Hinkley, Leicester
Rev’d Mike Warren St Peters Tunbridge Wells, Rochester
Rev’d Gordon Warren St Anne’s Limehouse, London
Rev’d Paul Whybrow St Olaf’s, Truro
Rev’d Paul Williams Christ Church Fulwood, Sheffield

(The Bishop of Lewes, the Rt Rev’d Wallace Benn, also wishes to be associated with this letter)