Why the Slow Pace of ACNA Church Planting in the Commonwealth of Kentucky?
By Robin G. Jordan
By Robin G. Jordan
Most of the ACNA churches in Kentucky are concentrated in
and around Lexington—the second largest city in the state. A number of these
churches predate the Anglican Church in North America. At least one was
originally affiliated with the Charismatic Episcopal Church—a Convergentist
denomination. It is now affiliated with the Anglo-Catholic Missionary Diocese
of All Saints. Two churches are affiliated with the Diocese of the Great Lakes
and two with the Diocese of the South. The two remaining ACNA churches that are
further north are affiliated with the REC Diocese of the Central States and the
Diocese of the South respectively. This is the extent of the ACNA presence in
the state.
It is noteworthy that Lexington is also where the Episcopal
Church has its largest concentration of churches in the Diocese of Lexington,
one of the two dioceses into which the state is divided. This suggests that the
majority of the ACNA churches were organized around breakway groups from the
Episcopal Church. The oldest of these churches was planted in the 1990s. Four
of the churches date from 2003. The only church that appears to have been
planted in recent times was organized around a group who had been attending an
ACNA church in a community a 21-minute drive from the community in which it is
located.
The Episcopal Church has 75 parishes and missions in
Kentucky, divided between the two dioceses. It took the Episcopal Church 180
years to expand to this point in the state. Episcopal church planting appears
to have come to a standstill in the 1980s. It was dealt a devastating blow with
the Robinson consecration in 2003.
At its present rate—seven churches over a 20 year-period—the
Anglican Church in North America may catch up to the Episcopal Church in 200
odd years in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, presuming that the ACNA will be
around two centuries from now and not have gone the way of the dodo. Since the
Episcopal Church is a denomination in decline, the ACNA may catch up to the
Episcopal Church in a shorter period of time as more and more Episcopal
churches close their doors.
With Southern Baptist churches which have enjoyed a measure
of success in Kentucky experiencing declining attendance and baptisms, I do not
anticipate that the Anglican Church in North America will outpace the Episcopal
Church any time soon if at all in Kentucky. As long as the ACNA follows the
pattern of the Episcopal Church during its church planting days in Kentucky, it
will be confined to major population centers and their outskirts. I do not see
the proposed Prayer Book as helping it move out of these areas into the less
densely populated areas of the state. The major population centers and their
outskirts are where the traditional constituencies of the Episcopal Church are
located. They appear to be the segment of the population at which ACNA churches
are targeted.
I am also convinced that what the Anglican Church in North
America has adopted as its standard approach to church planting will limit its
expansion in Kentucky. In that approach a group is hived off from an existing congregation
to form the nucleus of new congregation in a new community. This approach tends
to produce clones of the planting church in outlying communities, churches that
may not necessarily be a good match with the communities in which they are
planted. It is one of the drawbacks of this particular method of church
planting. The new churches suffer from the same limitations and weaknesses of
the planting church. What works in one community may not work in another.
The non-denomination church with which I am sojourning
discovered what worked here in Murray did not work in the nearby community
where it launched a satellite campus. The two communities were demographically
and culturally different from each other. The church was forced to reevaluate
and rethink its approach.
What the Anglican Church in North America has adopted as its
standard approach to church planting also produces churches that grow slowly.
Beginning small, they usually take several years before they become
self-supporting. Another drawback of
this method of church planting is that due to their size they may quickly
become inward-looking and lose their mission-orientation, presuming that they
had a mission-orientation in the first place.
This approach to church planting was commonly used in the
Episcopal Church during its church planting stage. New congregations would be
organized around a nucleus of Episcopalians resident in a community different
from the one where they attend an Episcopal church. A variation of this
approach is to organize a new congregation around a core-group of Episcopalians
resident in a community that has no Episcopal church within reasonable
traveling distance. This variation also produced churches that were mismatched
with the communities in which they were planted. The Episcopalians forming the
core-group typically had set ideas about the ministry and worship of an
Episcopal church and lacked the flexibility of mind to adapt the ministry and
worship of the new church to the local context. The result was typically a
disconnection between the new church and the community, which inhibited the
growth of the new church.
In this church planting approach a denomination expands by
the gradual colonization of adjacent areas. Such factors as favorable
demographics, ease of transportation, and population density and growth will
determine what areas are colonized. Churches that are planted with this
approach experience the fastest growth when they are planted in rapidly-growing
areas. They grow with the area. They are apt to plateau when their population
base—the segment of the population from which their church members and regular attenders are coming—plateaus.
They are also apt to go into decline when their population base goes into
decline.
Among the advantages of this church planting approach is
that it is not as resource-intensive as some other approaches. A church can
launch a satellite congregation in a neighboring community within reasonable traveling
distance of the church and a pastor from the church can conduct services for
the satellite congregation. When the new congregation grows to the point where
it would benefit from having a pastor of its own, the sponsoring church may
hire a pastor for that position or the judicatory may assume oversight of the
new congregation and provide the new congregation with a pastor. If the
sponsoring church is large and has several pastors, it may launch a number of
satellite congregations.
Whatever church planting approach is used, researchers have
found that if the new congregation does not plant a new congregation within
five years of its launch, it is not likely to plant a new congregation at any
time in its lifetime as a church. This is a crucial window. It helps to explain
why the older ACNA churches in the Lexington-Fayette Metro area have not
planted any new congregations.
This church planting approach was used to plant St. Michael’s
Episcopal Church, Mandeville in the mid-1980s and the Church of the Beloved, West
St. Tammany Parish in 2002 in the Diocese of Louisiana. St. Michael’s was launched as a satellite
congregation of Christ Episcopal Church, Covington. The nucleus of the new
congregation was formed from members of Christ Church resident in the
Mandeville area and interested persons from the community. The Church of the
Beloved was launched as a house church and met first in Mandeville and then in
Covington. Its nucleus was formed from members of what had been St. Michael’s prayer
and healing ministry team.
In a future article I will examine how those who pioneered St.
Michael’s would avoid some of the drawbacks of this church planting approach. I
also plan to share the insights that I gleaned from my involvement in five
other church plants during the past 13 odd years.
No comments:
Post a Comment