By Robin G. Jordan
The Catholic Revivalist vision of the Anglican Church in
North America is not that of an orthodox Anglican alternative to the Episcopal
Church (USA) and the Anglican Church of Canada but that of a
"Catholic" alternative to these provinces. This vision of
the ACNA is reflected in the jurisdiction’s governing documents and its working
ecclesiology as well as its doctrine and practices.
Under the provisions of the ACNA constitution the Provincial
Assembly, the largest and most representative body in the jurisdiction, has a
largely consultative role, much like similar bodies in the Roman Catholic
Church. It cannot initiate legislation nor can it modify the legislation
presented to it for ratification. It may make recommendations but the way the
business sessions of the Provincial Assembly are conducted, its delegates are
given no opportunity to appoint a committee for that purpose on their own
initiative, much less to consider a recommendation of a group of delegates
working outside its official structure.
In the Provincial Council bishops and other clergy are
represented in numbers disproportionate to the numbers of bishops and other
clergy in the jurisdiction. The clergy have as many representatives as the
laity. A provision permitting the cooption of additional members of Provincial
Council permits the bishops and other clergy to add more Council members from
their order. The diocesan bishops are de facto permanent members of the
Provincial Council despite the canonical provisions requiring the rotation of
Council members.
The College of Bishops has in a number of critical areas encroached
upon the role of the Provincial Council, the official governing body of the
jurisdiction, and usurped its authority and powers. Key decisions are not made
in the jurisdiction’s Provincial Council which includes lay members but in its
College of Bishops which consists solely of bishops. The College of Bishops has
significant input into the makeup of the various provincial taskforces and
their activities. Very little if anything is done without the College of
Bishops’ foreknowledge and approval.
The doctrine and practices mandated or sanctioned in the ACNA
Ordinal, its Catechism, and its proposed Prayer Book originated with the
College of Bishops. They have the finger prints of the College of Bishops all
over them. They reflect the theological outlook of the Catholic Revivalists who
occupy the place of power in the Anglican Church in North America and dominate
its College of Bishops.
This kind of system is not one in which historic Anglicanism
can flourish or meaningful reforms can be made. It is the kind of system that will
stifle Confessing Anglicans who are faithful to the Bible and the Anglican
formularies and stand in the Reformation tradition of the Anglican Church. It
is also the kind of system that historically has stymied reformers. Those who
see glimmers of hope in the Anglican Church in North America, I fear, are drowning
men clutching at straws.
While some may dismiss me as being overly-pessimistic where
the Anglican Church in North America is concerned, one has only to look at the
history of the sixteenth century Protestant Reformation, the history of the nineteenth
century Reformed Episcopal Church, and the more recent history of the
Continuing Anglican Movement to draw similar conclusions. I believe that the
time will come and indeed is now here when Confessing Anglicans will be faced
with the choice that the sixteenth Protestant Reformers faced. If they were to
bring the Church into line with the teaching of the Holy Scriptures, their
particular branch of the Church would have to break with the Church of Rome. In
the case of Confessing Anglicans, if they are to remain faithful to the Bible
and the Anglican formularies and to continue in the Anglican Church’s Reformation
heritage, they must separate themselves from the Anglican Church in North
America. They must establish a second province, one that is a part of the ACNA
but has its own formularies and form of government distinct from that of the
ACNA or is completely independent of the ACNA.
Based on the experience of the American Episcopal Church, I
believe that the second option is the most workable of the two options. Catholic
Revivalists do not look favorably upon jurisdictions whose self-understanding
is protestant and reformed, that are within the mainstream of classical
Anglicanism, and which give a full part in their doings to the laity. They are
not likely to go along with the formation of a second province within the
Anglican Church in North America, especially a second province that has its own
doctrinal foundation, its own catechism, its own Prayer Book, its own bishops,
and a synodical form of government.
Photo credit: Wales Online/OGL
Photo credit: Wales Online/OGL
No comments:
Post a Comment