Tuesday, July 14, 2020

Worship Is Not About Singing Only


By Robin G. Jordan

Singing and loud talking may play a significant role in the transmission of the COVID-19 coronavirus. The Centers for Disease Control drew that conclusion after investigating a cluster of COVID-19 cases that were traced to a choir rehearsal in Mount Vernon, Washington. Researchers in Germany drew a similar conclusion after a cluster of new COVID-19 cases was also traced to a choir rehearsal at one of Germany’s cathedrals. The Ecumenical Consultation on Protocols for Worship, Fellowship, and Sacraments subsequently recommended a temporary moratorium on choral singing, congregational singing, and corporate recitation. The State of California offered this guidance for places of worship:
Discontinue singing (in rehearsals, services, etc.), chanting, and other practices and performances where there is increased likelihood for transmission from contaminated exhaled droplets. Consider practicing these activities through alternative methods (such as internet streaming) that ensure individual congregation members perform these activities separately in their own homes.
England, Scotland, and Wales have placed restrictions on singing and chanting in church due to transmission risks. Northern Ireland in its guidance has warned churches of these risks and, while permitting singing, encourages a reduction of its use in church services and discourages loud, exuberant singing. Germany has banned singing and chanting in churches due to the transmission risks.

In this article I am going to look at what churches can do to work around these restrictions on Sundays and other occasions as churches are permitted to reopen their buildings for services of public worship. I am not recommending that these restrictions should be ignored as a small but highly vocal group of church leaders and churchgoers has been urging churches to do. What I will be proposing are alternative forms of worship that churches may wish to consider as substitutes for choral singing, congregational singing, and corporate recitation.

An initial step is for those who have responsibility for planning a church’s services of public worship to take a close look at how music was used in these services before COVID-19. All music used in a service is not used as an aid to worship. It may be used for other purposes. In determining how music was used, these questions may be helpful.
How much was music used as a part of the service itself?
How much was it used to embellish the service?
How much was it used as to fill the awkward silences?
How much was it used to cover the actions of the ministers?
Often as not these questions will reveal that far more music used in a service than was needed. Omitting this superfluous music may be the easy part. I say “may” because congregations frequently become attached to such unneeded music. From a liturgical point of view it may be redundant or unnecessary but you may have an argument on your hands when you point that to the attention of members of the congregation. At the same time the restrictions on singing and chanting do provided an excellent opportunity to prune away the clutter that parts of the service such as the opening of the service, the presentation of the people’s offerings, and the conclusion of the service tend to accumulate.

Churches that follow a set pattern of worship taken from a liturgical book (e.g., The Book of Alternative Services, The Book of Common Prayer, The Roman Missal, etc.) will have less difficulty narrowing down what music in the service may be viewed as “essential” and what may be regarded as “unessential.” These patterns of worship contain optional elements that may be omitted. A church may use several options at once due to parish custom but their use is not essential to the rite and in accordance with the liturgical principle, “less is more,” their omission may add to the dignity of the rite and give full expression to the noble simplicity that characterizes the rite at its best. For example, a church does not need to use an entrance song, the Kyries, and the Gloria in Excelsis at the beginning of a celebration of the Holy Eucharist. It only needs to use one of these elements. The ministers, for example, can enter to instrumental music. A cantor can sing the Kyries and the congregation can repeat them in the silence of their hearts. Alternately a mp3 or a video of a cantor singing the Kyries can be played and the congregation can repeat them without vocalizing them.

These churches are likely to have a tradition of services that are normally conducted without music. Anglican, Episcopal, Lutheran, and Roman Catholic churches have such a tradition. Early morning and weekday celebrations of the Holy Eucharist in these ecclesiastical traditions generally do not have music. Weekday Eucharist celebrations may not have a homily or sermon. Some Anglicans, Episcopalians, Lutherans, and Roman Catholics prefer these quiet celebrations to those that have hymns, psalms, service music, and anthems. C. S. Lewis was one such individual. He had a low opinion of church music.

These churches are also likely to have a tradition of silence in their services—silence after each Scripture reading, silence after the psalm or canticle between the first two readings, silence after the sermon, silence after each petition of the Prayers of the People, and silence at the conclusion of the distribution of communion.

Further on in this article I will look at several alternative forms of worship that a liturgical church can use to replace any songs which it has determined are “essential” to the service.

Churches that may find the restriction on singing more challenging are those that have a localized pattern of worship, one that has been influenced by what is sometimes referred to as “contemporary worship.” Contemporary worship, however, is a misnomer because this pattern of worship has its roots in the revivals and camp meetings of the nineteenth century. At those gathering a “music service” featuring gospel songs preceded the “preaching service” at which one or more preachers harangued the gathering. The music service was intended to prepare those present at the revival or camp meeting for the main event—the preaching service. In the modern-day version of this worship pattern the sermon is preceded by a “worship set”—a medley of praise and worship songs and perhaps a contemporary version of a traditional hymn or gospel song. Among the elements noticeably missing from this type of service are Scripture readings, prayer, and congregational singing. As this pattern of worship has grown in popularity, it has been accompanied by a decline in congregational singing. The worship songs used in this type of service are increasingly chosen for their suitability for performance by the praise band.

The praise band that sings the songs of the worship set is amplified to the point that the congregation can “feel the beat” and not hear themselves sing. The congregation may sing along with the praise band or listen to the band. The music of the praise band is too loud for the members of the congregation to hear each other, much less to sing with one voice. It is not congregational singing in the true sense of the word or corporate worship. It is what may be described as parallel worship. The praise band and the congregation may occupy the same room but they are not worshiping together. Parallel worship is akin to parallel play observed in small children. They may be playing beside each other but they are not playing with each other.

Parallel worship was common in the Medieval Catholic Church. At celebrations of Mass the priest chanted or said the readings and the prayers of the Mass in the Latin. A choir sung the Ordinaries and Propers of the Mass, using elaborate polyphonic settings which were so composed and arranged that the congregation could not properly understand the words even if they knew Latin. The members of the congregation either stood and chatted while awaiting the highpoint of the Mass—the elevation and showing of the consecrated elements for their adoration—or they knelt on the straw-covered floor of the nave and said their private devotions, reciting the Pater Noster and the Ave Maria.

Those singing along with the praise band at a contemporary worship service tend to try to match their voices to the voices of the vocalists in the band even though the songs may be sung at too high a key or pitch for congregational singing. This tendency means that they are breathing deeply and singing loudly. If there are COVID-19 coronavirus particles floating in the air, they are more likely to inhale them than the other members of the congregation who are listening to the band. If they are infected with the virus, they are more likely to exhale virus particles. If the room in which the service is held is poorly ventilated and the air in the room is recirculated, the members of the congregation are not wearing face masks, they are not sitting or standing at least six feet apart, and the service is not kept short, you have a high risk situation. It takes only one super-spreader, a person who is infected with the COVID-19 coronavirus and whose body is producing high numbers of virus particles for reasons that we do not yet fully understand, to turn a church service into a super-spreader event. That is why it is critical not to rely on one precautionary measure but to apply the principle of levels of intervention and to put several precautionary measures in place.

Most churches that have contemporary worship services and praise bands are attractional. The service and the band are a major part of its attraction. Restrictions on singing and the use of praise bands reduce the church’s attraction which accounts at least in part for why its church leaders and attendees may oppose these restrictions. Other precautionary measures also reduce the church’s attractiveness. A workaround like recording videos of the praise band, using methods that All Souls Langham Place has pioneered with its choir and its orchestra, and then playing them during the service in place of a live band, have a major drawback. it eliminates a major attraction of the church. If you are an attendee, you are likely to ask yourself, “Why did I come today?” I could have stayed home and watched the church’s service on Facebook.

One of the reasons that some church leaders and churchgoers are fighting the restriction on singing and other precautionary measures is that they want a quick return to “normalcy” or at least the illusion of “normalcy.” With the explosion of new COVID-19 cases across the United States, any return to the days before the COVID-19 pandemic is not going to happen. We are just in the first round of the pandemic. Pretending that the pandemic is not as serious as the health experts say, a view that the White House has been encouraging for political reasons, is not going to make the COVID-19 coronavirus go away. It is whistling past the cemetery.

President Trump and his top advisers believe a reinvigorated economy will boost his chances of re-election so they are eager to have people return to work and children to school despite the surges of new COVID-19 cases in a number of states. In the Commonwealth of Kentucky the number of new cases continues to climb. Governor Andy Beshear announced 576 new cases on Tuesday, edging the statewide total up to at least 20, 223. Among yesterday's 272 new cases are 11 children under the age of five. The number of new cases in Calloway County where I live has been steadily climbing. As of Monday afternoon the Calloway County Health Department reported 5 new confirmed cases. The total number of confirmed cases is now at 112. As Robert R. Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control has warned, for every single confirmed case, there are 10 more unconfirmed cases. These individuals may be experiencing relatively mild symptoms or they have not yet exhibited symptoms. However, they are infectious. Super-spreaders, individuals who are exhaling so many virus particles into their surroundings that they have been likened to the chimney, or smoke stack, of a virus factory, may have mild symptoms or they may be pre-symptomatic. They can go undetected. They have also been described as “silent spreaders.”

For churches that have contemporary worship services and praise bands, the best option may be outdoor services—drive-in services and lawn services. The platform should be large enough to accommodate the members of the band standing at least six feet apart and separated by Plexiglass or Perspex dividers and should be more than sixteen feet away from the nearest household group. The ground should be marked off into squares with a walkaway running between the squares. Each household should occupy a square which would be large enough for them to maintain social distancing from the surrounding household groups. Each household should be assigned a square and should be required to wear face masks. The service should be oriented to the prevailing wind. The worship set and the sermon should be kept short. Keeping a service short reduces the likelihood of exposure to the virus. My former church experimented with using an outdoor amphitheater at a local city park. It held one service at the amphitheater and then went back to streaming its services online.

Churches that may be described as “semi-liturgical” and which have a localized pattern of worship incorporating liturgical elements, should scrutinize their services in the same way as liturgical churches and identify and eliminate any superfluous music. They should then explore alternative forms of worship with which they can replace any remaining songs.

Singing is not the only way that Christians worship God. While some Christians may equate the worship of God with singing, they have an inadequate view of worship. Jesus told the Samaritan woman at the well of Jacob that God desires true worshippers, those who worship him in spirit and in truth. What does it mean to worship God in spirit and in truth? It means to orient our lives to God and honor him with every thought, feeling, word, and action. Jesus quotes the prophet Isaiah in his condemnation of the practices of the Pharisees and the scribes. This is the passage from the Book of Isaiah that he cites.
“The Lord said: Because these people draw near with their mouths and honour me with their lips, while their hearts are far from me, and their worship of me is a human commandment learned by rote….”
We can sing songs of praise and adoration to God but our hearts can be far from him. We are not worshipping him in spirit and in truth. Singing can affect our brain chemistry and give us a temporary emotional high. While churchgoers can become addicted to this high and experience withdrawal without their “weekly worship fix,” it is not worship. A song leads to genuine worship when it shifts our mental focus away from ourselves to God and we praise and adore God from our innermost being—from what the Bible calls our “hearts.” It reinforces our orientation to God and lends words to our praise and adoration of God.

While “hymns, psalms, and spiritual songs” play an important role in our services of public worship, they are not the only ways that we give expression to our praise and adoration of God, encourage each other, instruct each other, exhort each other, and build up each other’s faith. Here are some other ways that we do these things.

Read Scripture Aloud. The apostle Peter reminds us in his first epistle that we have been called out of darkness into God’s marvellous light in order to proclaim his mighty deeds. Scripture readings can be pre-recorded and the recordings of the readings played while the words of the readings are projected onto a screen or shown on a large flatscreen monitor. Or the recordings of the readings can be played by themselves. The readings should not be lengthy ones which would defeat the purpose of keeping services short so as reduce the risk of COVID-19 exposure. A translation that is easy for all ages to understand should be used. Members of the congregation could be invited to read a particular passage of Scripture and record it. It would be one way of involving members of the congregation who are sheltering in their homes because they fall into one or more of the high risk categories or otherwise are unable to attend public services of worship. For example, a member of their household may fall into one or more of the high risk categories. They themselves have been diagnosed with the COVID-19 coronavirus and are self-isolating. If a reader does not have an easy to understand translation of the Bible, a script may be emailed to them which they can read while recording themselves. If a reader does not have internet access, they might be recorded over the phone. Involving church members who cannot attend a service of public worship for any reason signals to them that they are a part of a church’s community. They have not been forgotten.

Testimonials. A number of churches already make a video recordings of the testimony of newcomers and church members and play these recordings at services of public worship. Newcomers and church members who are not comfortable making a video recording of themselves at home may be interviewed over the phone. They should be given advanced notice and permission for the interview obtained. Some newcomers and church members may be able to record their testimony on their phone and then submit it. These newcomers and church members and those who are comfortable making a video recording of themselves at home should be provided with guidance in regard what they should include in their testimony and how long they should record themselves. Sharing with other newcomers and church members how God is working in their lives during the pandemic may be very encouraging to them.

Pre-recorded Songs, Instrumental Pieces, and Prayers. Hymns, psalms, canticles, worship songs, service music, and anthems may be prerecorded at home or in an improvised studio and then played during services of public worship. All Souls Langham Place has pioneered recording musicians and choristers at home and then assembling the recordings into a single video. Youtube has a number of videos offering tips and guidance on virtual choirs and music ensembles. As well as members of the choir and the music ensemble, members of the congregation and friends of the church who have music talent may be invited to make video recordings of a song or instrumental piece and submit them. The recordings can be not only played during an in-person service or gathering but also streamed online. A church will need to invest in a comprehensive CCLI or Licensing copyright, performance, and streaming license. Churches can also purchase high quality videos and mp3s of music that can be streamed online as well as played during in-person services and gatherings. If the music in question is not covered by existing licenses, churches will need to secure permission for its use. This may involve the payment of a reasonable fee. Permission to use the music may come with the original purchase.

Prayers may also be recorded at home or in an improvised studio and then played during services of public worship. Extempore prayers should be kept short and should not be turned into mini-sermons. Set prayers should not be rushed. They should be offered prayerfully and from the heart. A brief pause for silent prayer should be observed after each petition of a litany or other form of general intercession.

Pre-recorded songs, instrumental pieces, and prayers are also another way of involving members of the congregation who are sheltering in their homes because they fall into one or more of the high risk categories or otherwise are unable to attend public services of worship.

Body Movements, Postures, and Gestures. We not only worship God with our lips but we worship him with our whole bodies. We raise hands, palms upturned, in praise and supplication. We bow our heads. We kneel in prayer and adoration. We prostate ourselves before the Lord. We stretch our hands in blessing. We sign ourselves with the cross. The restriction on singing may actually save us from the habit of praising God with our noses stuck in a hymnal and of singing to our feet. It may also save us from the habit of standing with our hands at our sides or in our pockets or looking at the glowing screen of our phones while the praise team sings. It may ring the death knell of the concert that passes itself off as a service of public worship. We should not underestimate the importance of body movements, postures, and gestures in our worship.

In the 1970s and the 1980s the Fisherfolk teams of the Community of Celebration introduced the use of various hand gestures, mime, and dance into the worship of the Anglican and Episcopal churches around the world as the winds of renewal swept through the Anglican Communion. Their introduction of hand gestures in worship brings us to the next way of worshiping God, one which has been overlooked in the debate over singing in church services

Signing Hymns, Worship Songs, and Prayers. How many churches have a signing service for members of the community who are hearing impaired and communicate with sign language? How many churches have a skilled interpreter who can translate into sign language readings, sermons, and prayers? The COVID-19 pandemic and the restriction on singing is providing a wonderful opportunity to learn sign language and to use it in our worship of God, thereby making our services more inclusive of individuals who are hearing impaired. Sign language is a visual form of communication developed by and for people who are hearing impaired. It uses hand shapes, movements of hands, arms, and body and facial expression to convey meaning. It is used worldwide but differs from region to region in the same way spoken language differs. American Sign Language (ASL) is used in the United States. The preceding information was taken from the Dictionary of Hymnology’s article, “Signing Hymns.” The Episcopal Conference on the Deaf has an article on its website, “Singing Songs in Sign Language,” which offers ideas for using sign language as a form of worship. The ECD is working on a Prayer Book translation in ASL. Abingdon Press has produced in cooperation with the United Methodist Conference of the Deaf Hymns for Sign—American Sign Language. A description of this resource may found on the Abingdon Press website. Pinterest “Worship in Sign Language” page has links to videos of what it describes as 44 of the best sign worship songs.

Subvocalization. Subvocalization, or silent speech, can be defined as follows:
“… the internal speech typically made when reading; it provides the sound of the word as it is read This is a natural process when reading, and it helps the mind to access meanings to comprehend and remember what is read, potentially reducing cognitive load.”
Subvocalization is not confined to reading. When we pray silently, we are subvocalizing. As well as saying the words of prayers inaudibly, we can also sing the lyrics of hymns, psalms, canticles, worship songs, service music, and anthems inaudibly. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, it was often my practice to go to church early and listen to the choir practicing hymns, anthems, and service music for the service. I would sing along with the choir inaudibly. In this way I learned the tunes of hymns and service music with which I was not familiar as well as the melody of the different parts of the anthem that the choir was singing that Sunday.

The apostle Paul’s advice to the members of the church at Ephesus “to sing and make melody in their hearts can be understood in terms of subvocalization. He is encouraging them to give God thanks and praise with their inner voice. It also can be understood in terms of contemplative adoration.

When a cantor, whether live or pre-recorded, sings a song of praise or adoration or a prayer song, members of the congregation can add their voices to the song but inaudibly. In this way they make the praise, the adoration, or the prayer their own. A number of songs in the Roman Catholic repertoire have verses with irregular settings. They also have refrains that have an easy-to-learn melody and in which the congregation can join. In this way they make the song their own. If these songs are used often, the congregation also may learn the settings of the verses. This type of song has a long history in the Christian Church and can be traced to the worship in the Temple in Jerusalem. The call-and-response song as this type of song is also called plays a large part in African indigenous church music. The refrain and repetitive parts of these songs can be sung by the congregation inaudibly.

If you have attended a charismatic church, you may have heard members of the congregation making spontaneous interjections of praise and thanksgiving. You may have also heard the entire congregation breaking into spontaneous praise and adoration at the conclusion of a song. These practices have migrated to non-charismatic churches so you may also have encountered them in a non-charismatic church. These ejaculations, sometimes called ejaculatory prayers or aspirations, have a long history in Christianity. They can also be subvocalized. The Puritan theologian and writer William Perkins urged those studying underneath him to "pray continually" through "secret and inward ejaculations of the heart".

Subvocalized singing does not require the deep breathing that vocalized singing requires. Consequently, members of the congregation who are singing inaudibly are less likely to inhale any COVID-19 coronavirus particles that are floating in the air. A member of a congregation who has the COVID-19 coronavirus and who is singing inaudibly is not going exhale as many COVID-19 coronavirus particles as he or she would if she were singing loudly and exuberantly.

Clapping and Foot Stamping. Clapping and foot stamping are also forms of worship. In songs like Gloria a Dios (Glory to God), sung to the tune GLORIA PERU, hand-clapping provide the accompaniment to the melody. In Stephen P. Starke’s metrical version of the Benedicite, “All You Works of God Bless the Lord,” which is set to Doreen Potter’s adaptation of the Jamaican tune LINSTEAD MARKET, hand-clapping provides the accompaniment to the refrain. In some forms of indigenous African church music rhythmic foot stamping is the only accompaniment. One caveat should be mentioned. Vigorous hand-clapping like other forms of vigorous exercise involve deep breathing. Deep breathing, as I have already noted, increase the risks of COVID-19 transmission.

A church might explore the use of hand-held percussion instruments like claves and blocks, which does not require as vigorous movements as hand-clapping. In the Coptic Church the butt of a wooden staff struck against the floor of the church is used to keep time when psalms are chanted. Since the restriction on singing includes chanting, this practice might be put to some other use. As in the case of vigorous hand-clapping any activity that causes deep breathing should be avoided.

Silence. Silence has a long history in Christian worship. Times of silence may be used to contemplate the attributes of God, his mighty deeds, and most importantly his grace—his mercy and goodwill toward his creatures, ourselves. Times of silence may be used to reflect upon a Scripture reading that has been read, a psalm or canticle that has been sung, or a sermon that has been preached. At St. Gregory of Nyssa Episcopal Church, San Francisco, a church known for its colorful, experimental worship, the time for silence for reflection, which follows each reading is “ushered in by the ringing of Tibetan singing bowls and gently ended by the ringing of Tibetan meditation chimes.” For those who might not be comfortable with singing bowls and meditation chimes, a clapper-less handbell might be struck lightly with a wooden mallet to signal the beginning and end of the time of silence. Times of silence may also be used for silent prayer.

A particularly suitable time for silence is immediately after the invitation to prayer that precedes the Prayers of the People or the Prayers as Anglican and Episcopal liturgical books call them or the Prayers of Intercession as Lutheran liturgical books call them. It is also appropriate to follow each petition with a time of silence immediately before the congregational response if there is one. This time of silence, like the time of silence immediately after the invitation to prayer provides an opportunity for members of the congregation to offer their own petitions and thanksgivings. A time of silence for the same reason should also precede the concluding collect or the Lord’s Prayer, whichever prayer rounds out the Intercessions.

The rubrics of The Roman Missal direct that a time of silence should follow the distribution of the communion elements and a number of Anglican, Episcopalian, and Lutheran churches have adopted this practice.

Bells. Bells have been used to call Christians to prayer and to call them to worship since the fifth century. The early Celtic monks used a square, iron bell struck with a wooden mallet to summon the local villagers to join them in prayer. The solemn ringing of one or more bells or the playing of a recording of bells ringing may be used not only to signal the beginning of a service but also to take the place of an entrance song. Bells were also rung at one time during the singing or chanting of the Sanctus, hence the term “sacring bell” or “sanctus bell.”

Sermons. Sermon and homilies that exalt God and his attributes; which draw attention to his might deeds, particularly the salvific work of Jesus Christ; and which encourage churchgoers to frame their lives around Jesus, his teachings, and his example are a form of worship. They orient us to God and give honor to God. In order to reduce the length of in-person services and gatherings and the possibility of exposure to the COVID-19 coronavirus, sermons and homilies should be kept short. As an added precautionary measure it would be wise to erect a Plexiglas or Perspex screen in front of the pulpit. While it may be difficult to preach in a face mask, preachers should wear face masks at all other times.

Sacraments. The sacraments of Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are forms of worship. They both point to what God has done for us. In their observance we seek to orient ourselves to God and to honor God. Due to the transmission risks that may be associated with their celebration, I am going to address the celebration of the sacraments in a separate article.

Let us take a brief look at how these forms of worship might be used in a celebration of the Holy Eucharist. Earlier in this article I suggested paring the music used in the service to what might be regarded as “essential.” Let us assume the congregation has taken their seats and the liturgical ministers theirs. A video of one of the church’s musicians playing an instrumental piece on the cello has just concluded. A bell tolls and a deep silence falls over the gathering. A cantor separated from the congregation by a Plexiglas or Perspex shield sing a simple, familiar setting of the Kyries. During the singing of the Kyries the congregation is also singing but inaudibly. When the singing of the Kyries conclude, the presiding minister offers the Prayer of the Day.

A video of the first lesson read by an older member of the congregation and recorded at her home is played. After the reading a clapper-less bell is struck with a wooden mallet and a profound silence once more falls over the gathering. The cantor sings the refrain of a responsorial psalm and the congregation repeats the refrain but inaudibly. The cantor sings the verses of the psalm, the congregation join her on the refrain, singing it silently in their hearts. At the conclusion of the psalm the bell is again struck with the mallet and silence descends over the gathering. A video of the second lesson read by a member of the congregation with a pre-existing condition and recorded at his home is played. After the reading the bell is again struck and silence descends. A mp3 of a lively alleluia is played, the kind of alleluia that if you cannot sing it, you can hum along with the tune and tap your toe to it. The presiding minister goes to the pulpit and reads the gospel. A Plexiglas or Perspex shield separates him from the congregation. After the reading the bell is struck and silence falls. At the conclusion of the silence the presiding minister prays for the empowerment of his words by the Holy Spirit and then begins the sermon. Silence follows the sermon.

After the period of silence that follows the sermon the presiding minister reads the Nicene Creed which is also projected on the screens. After each section of the creed, the presiding minister asks the congregation if they believe what it says. The congregation responds, “I do.”

From his seat an assistant minister, standing, invites the congregation to pray. After a short period of silence the assistant minister begins the Prayers. After each petition, he pauses for silent prayer. The Prayers conclude with a period of silence and the Lord’s Prayer. A mp3 of instrumental music or a video of an anthem is played as the table is prepared.

A shortened eucharistic prayer is said by the presiding minister, a brief prayer of thanksgiving followed by the Words of Institution. The communion is only in one kind. The bread for the people’s communion is kept separate from that for the presiding minister’s communion and is kept in a covered container. The presiding minister wears protective gloves during the consecration of the elements. He also wears a face mask. He only lifts his face mask to eat two pieces of his wafer and to drink from the cup. He then takes off the protective gloves, sanitizes his hands, and dons a new pair of protective gloves.

The communicants come forward one at a time and receive a wafer from the presiding minister or an assisting minister who is also wearing a face mask and protective gloves. The communicants are wearing face masks and maintaining at least distance of six feet between themselves and the next communicant. The communicants receive standing. The minister places a wafer on their outstretched hands without touching their hands. They turn away from the minister, lift their mask, and eat the wafer. They then return to their seats.

After all have received communion, a period of silence is kept, all seated. The presiding minister rises and then says a short post-communion thanksgiving. He then blesses and dismisses the congregation.

As you can see this is a rather austere celebration of the Holy Eucharist. There is no entrance song, no entrance procession, no presentation of the gifts, no recessional song, and no exit procession. The only music is the penitential Kyries, the gradual psalm, the alleluia before the gospel reading, and instrumental music or anthem during the preparation of the table. The latter is not to cover the actions of the liturgical ministers but to prepare the congregation for what follows. An mp3 of instrumental music or a video of a communion song might be played during the distribution of the bread. It is a celebration of the Holy Eucharist that a small church could pull off, using pre-recorded music. The only person who sings in the service is the cantor and the cantor can be replaced by recordings.

I hope that with this article I primed the pump so to speak. When you prime an old-fashioned pump, you pour water into the pump and then start pumping. You may have to add more water. What you are doing is creating a column of water in the well, which will eventually bring fresh water gushing from the spout of the pump. The moratorium on choral singing, congregational singing, and corporate recitation forces us to be more creative in the ways that we worship God, I do not see that as a bad thing. While we may not be able to sing aloud at church for a season, we can sing aloud at home. The shift from singing in church to singing at home I believe is a good thing. Churches can post lyrics on their websites and mp3s and videos of the music to which the lyrics may be sung and encourage member households to sing at home. This shift could eventually lead to a revival of congregation singing.
The image that I am posting with this article is an image of a singing bowl. It is a standing or resting bell which may be played by striking or by rotating a mallet around the outside rim to produce a sustained tone. This tone is what earned the singing bowl its name.

10 Reasons We Should Still Take the Coronavirus Seriously


Leaders’ missteps have created mistrust, but we still have to fight a pandemic

An Alaskan reader challenged us to share 10 reasons to take the coronavirus pandemic seriously—to believe that it is “not a hoax,” as she put it. Her state’s experience with the coronavirus has encouraged its residents to see it as a faraway problem: The entire state has suffered only 17 deaths so far, whereas a single nursing home in my area saw a higher death toll.

Part of Alaska’s separation is geographic. Air traffic largely ceased from mid-March until recently, and few would-be visitors braved the lengthy road trip through Canada. (For the curious: Yes, Canada allowed Americans to drive across the border if they promised they were heading straight for Alaska.)

That brings us to the first reason: As Arizona, Texas, and Florida have shown, case counts can rise quickly in places that hadn’t been hit hard. This isn’t mainly from increased testing, because the percentage of positive tests is increasing—not decreasing. Frustration with the economic damage from shutdowns has led to political resistance, just as annoyance with the shutdowns’ inconveniences has led to fatigue among the public. Both mean that we are likely entering a period where the virus spreads more rapidly. My county now reports 100 and even 200 cases per day—far beyond even its April high—but plans minimal restrictions in response. Read More

Also See:
No, the CDC is not on the verge of lifting 'epidemic' label for COVID-19
In the Commonwealth of Kentucky state and local authorities are struggling to gain the cooperation of the public in complying the  public health measures that they implemented to contain the virus in the state. I went shopping for groceries early this morning. The supermarket opens early in the morning for older people and those who have pre-existing conditions. A large sign posted on the door at the entrance to the supermarket warned shoppers that the store was cooperating with the governor's emergency order requiring the wearing of face masks. All the store clerks wore face masks. As I was about to drive away, I saw a middle-aged man enter the store. He was not wearing a face mask. He exemplifies the lack of cooperation with which state and local authorities are struggling.

In the state and my county the number of COVID-19 cases are steadily climbing. In Lexington they are skyrocketing.

The organization (if it is an organization and not one individual ) that posted the article which was fact-checked in the second article deliberately circulated false information on the Facebook. The disinformation that was contained in the article was the kind of false information that alt right and other extremists groups and agents of foreign powers circulate on Facebook to create political and social instability in the United States. False references are an indicator of deliberate disinformation and not misinformation--inaccurate information someone has picked up somewhere and is passing it on to other people.

It Takes a Village to Help Single Parents


April 22, 2011 is a day that lives in infamy in my home state of Alabama. Beginning in the dark hours before dawn, 62 tornadoes roared through the state. In spite of all the warnings, the school cancellations, and our statewide familiarity with tornado protocol, 253 people died.

During this pandemic, I’ve often thought of how alone I felt that day, wanting to protect my children from forces too large and sinister for one mom to handle. I was a brand-new widow grappling with overwhelming grief. That fearful day, I felt raw and exposed without my husband to help me protect our kids. We had friends who would help if we needed it, but as the sirens wailed, each of them needed to care for their own families. I felt as if the weight of my children’s lives rested on my weak shoulders alone.

To be fair, everyone in Alabama felt vulnerable that day, just as all of us have some measure of concern about coronavirus now. But being a single parent during a crisis adds layers of anxiety. Everything married parents are doing right now, single parents are doing alone, with no relief and no respite. Read More

Monday, July 13, 2020

Monday's Catch: Questions to Ask When Your Church Isn't Growing and More


5 Key Questions You Should Ask if Your Church Isn't Growing

One of the best things any leader can do when they’re in a tough spot is to stop making assumptions and start asking questions. Our assumptions got us to where we are, but they won’t necessarily get us where we need to go. Here are 5 telling questions every leader can ask when their church stops growing.... Read More

Fifteen Characteristics of Genuinely Friendly Churches

This post originally appeared in November 2014. It has been updated to reflect changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Read More

5 Tips for Effective Preaching during Difficult Seasons

How we as ministers are handling this time where the church and the world are experiencing a difficult season—in both a corporate and an individual sense. How are we demonstrating encouragement from our pulpits? Here are five practices—and I’m sure there are more—that have come alive for me in these recent days. Read More

What Does Discipleship Look Like in Real Life

Jesus said, in Mark 1:17, “Follow me … and I will make you fish for people.” The next thing it says in verse 18 is, “Immediately they left their nets and followed him.” This exact same pattern is duplicated in verse 20 because, like Miyagi and Daniel, the disciple is supposed to do everything the leader says, without question or hesitation. Such is discipleship in real life. Read More

If “They’ll Know We Are Christians by Our Love,” Will They Know We Are Missionaries by Our Listening?

The brooms in Tanzania start early each day. A familiar “swish, swish, swish” emanates from every house. When I moved here, I was shocked that most women sweep their houses daily and mop the floors three times a week. At first, that routine seemed kind of ridiculous to me. So, I made the most basic mistake warned about in Missionary 101: Judging instead of Listening. I didn’t ask anyone why they swept every day. I didn’t stop to remember that Tanzanians are experts at living in Tanzania. I just stubbornly clung to what I knew to be true of housekeeping in America and tried to apply it here. Read More

12 Key Statements on Human Sexuality

In this article Tim Challies draws attention to the report of the Presbyterian Church in America study committee on human sexuality and the Twelve Statements contained in the report. The report was released in May of this year ahead of the PCA's next General Assembly. Read More

Sunday, July 12, 2020

All Hallows Evening Prayer for Sunday Evening (July 12, 2020)


I have posted All Hallows Evening Prayer for Sunday Evening (July 12, 2020) on the All Hallows Murray blog.

All Hallows Evening Prayer grew out of a perceived need for a service of praise, proclamation, and prayer for those who are unable to sing in their church or hear a choir or music ensemble in their church.

All Hallows Evening Prayer draws upon liturgical elements and music from a variety of traditions—Anglican, Episcopal, Lutheran, Methodist, and Roman Catholic to name a few. It is ecumenical in its focus.

All Hallows Evening Prayer shows what a small church can do even with limited musical resources.

The order of service is taken from the Anglican Church of Canada’s The Book of Alternative Services (1985).

The paraphrase of the ancient lamp-lighting hymn Phos Hilaron, “O Laughing Light, O First Born of Creation,” is taken from the Anglican Church of Canada’s Common Praise (1998). The choral arrangement is by John Van Maanen.

The penitential psalm, Psalm 141, is Tony Alonso’s responsorial setting “Like Burning Incense, O Lord.” The variable psalm is Christopher Walker’s adaptation of Psalm 27, “The Lord Is My Light.” The first psalm prayer comes from the Lutheran Book of Worship Ministers Desk Edition (1983); the second psalm prayer from the Church of England’s Common Worship (2000).

The paraphrase of the Magnificat is taken from With One Voice: A Lutheran Resource for Worship (1995). The choral arrangement is by Ann Krentz.

The litany for the evening is taken from the Episcopal Church’s The Book of Common Prayer (1979). The Collect for Aid against Perils comes from Common Worship (2000).

The dismissal hymn, “We Praise You, Father, for Your Gifts,” is taken from Common Praise (1998). It also appears in GIA’s Hymnal for the Hours (1989) and other hymnals and music collections.

The link to this evening’s service is: https://allhallowsmurray.blogspot.com/2020/07/all-hallows-evening-prayer-for-sunday_12.html#more

Please feel free to share the link with anyone whom you may believe might be interested.

I hope that the service will be a blessing to you and will round out your observance of the Lord’s Day for you.

Coronavirus: Singing Church Members 'Miss Companionship'


Churches and chapels in Wales are waiting to hear when they can reopen - but members say they will miss the companionship of singing together.

Scientific evidence suggests singing increases the spread of respiratory droplets, thus increasing the risk of spreading coronavirus among a crowd.

Churches in England opened for the first time since lockdown last Sunday, but singing was not allowed.

The minister of a Welsh church in London said it was "very strange".

"It was a great experience to be back on Sunday," said the Reverend Aneirin Glyn, of the Welsh Church of St Benet, in the City of London.

"But we didn't get to sing or offer after-service refreshments.

"We're very fond of singing as Welsh people, and it was very strange not to be able to sing as part of our worship."

Rev Glyn said some members had recorded hymns to play during the service, but "we could not sing with the recordings". Read More
I bookmarked this article yesterday evening to post this morning. The attitudes of the people mentioned in this article is so different from those of the Americans about whom I published my most recent article. The later is resentful of the measures that are recommended for their own protection and the protection of others. Some talk as if it is their God-given right to do as they please irrespective of the consequences to themselves or others. Their attitudes are what one might expect to find in a rebellious adolescent, recycling through the developmental stage of the "terrible twos," not a mature adult.

Saturday, July 11, 2020

COVID-19 Denialism--A Threat to the Health and Safety of US Churches


By Robin G. Jordan

As I read through the comments that some individuals have left in response to the Church Leaders article, “Doctors: Religious Services Are Among Highest Risk Activities,” I am forced to conclude that the medical professionals who developed the two charts examined in the article overlooked a major contributing factor to why religious services may be high risk activities—the high levels of denial in one segment of the Christian population of the United States in regard to the seriousness of the COVID-19 pandemic and the need for precautionary measures to prevent the transmission of the virus. This segment of the US Christian population may not be large but it is highly vocal. It not only dismisses the seriousness of the pandemic and the risk of infection but also argues that what are reasonable public health measures in a pandemic of the magnitude and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic are a form of religious persecution.

While I do not believe that we should demonize the people with whom we disagree, I also believe that the attitudes of this population segment represent a threat to the health and safety of Christians and the larger population. I characterize this population segment as Christian because it identifies itself as “Christian” and frequents a website that identifies itself as “Christian.” Whether this population segment’s beliefs and values are Christian in the sense that they are consistent with the teaching and example of Jesus, however, is an open question. The attitudes that this population segment displays are “un-Christian” in that they do not conform to Jesus’ teaching and example and reflect a number of the worst non-Christian stereotypical views of Christians. Consequently, they may not only represent a health and safety threat to Christians and the larger population but also they may represent a threat to the witness of Christians in the United States and around the world.

I will concede that some individuals who are leaving comments on the Church Leaders website may have succumbed to the Jeckyll and Hyde effect that Keith Mathison describes in his article, “A Social Media Jeckyll & Hyde Effect.” Offline they may be less vociferous and more reasonable. The attitudes that underlie their online comments, however, give cause for concern. Their denial of the seriousness of the COVID-19 pandemic points to a major disconnect, or lack of understanding or connection with reality. So does the characterization of reasonable public health measures as a form of religious persecution.

If members of this population segment are church-goers and they exercise a measure of influence in the decision-making process of their church, the church is likely not taking adequate precautionary measures if it is taking any precautionary measures at all. If either is the case, the church represents a health and safety threat not only to its attendees but also to the community. The extent to which the church may pose a health and safety threat to the community will depended upon such factors as the size of the church, the size of the community, and the extent of its members’ contacts with the community. In a small community in which most of its members attend a particular church, that church may become the epicenter of a cluster of COVID-19 cases that affect a large segment of the community.

The members of this population segment are not only influenced by the inaccurate and fake information being circulated on the internet but they also circulate this information, using it in promoting their view of the pandemic and the reasonable public health measures that state and local governments have implemented to contain its spread. They are not satisfied just to express their view but aggressively seek to propagate it.

At the same time I do not want to tar everyone in this population segment with the same brush. Some members of this population segment may be the victims of misinformation themselves. They have been led to believe like one unfortunate young man that the pandemic is a hoax. He learned that the pandemic was not a hoax when the virus killed him. Others may be struggling with the painful realities of a full-blown epidemic. Denial is not an uncommon reaction to such a calamity. People in a state of denial will respond with fear and anger to anything that threatens their denial. Fear often underlies anger. Rather than deal with the anxieties that circumstances may arouse, they respond with anger. People in a state of denial will also seek to bolster their denial by seeking to convince others that the way they see things is the only way to see them. It is easier to deny something when others are also denying the same thing. They will reinforce each other’s denial.

Denial in a public health emergency like the COVID-19 pandemic is a serious problem. It can interfere significantly with efforts to respond to the emergency. It should not be treated as a difference of opinion. Treating it as such only reinforces the denial and lends it legitimacy. We may be forced to take that position in hopes of gaining the cooperation of those in a state of denial but ultimately it will prove counterproductive. They will fall back on the argument, “Well, that’s just your opinion,” as if in an epidemic there can be a wide variance of opinion, including the opinion that there is no epidemic at all!

This brings me to a second area of concern. Based upon the range of articles that they have been publishing, the editors of the Church Leaders website are not in my estimation taking a firm position on the need for public health measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. Church Leaders draws articles from a number of other websites as well as uses the articles of freelance writers. Its selection of articles can be very revealing into its editorial policies.

This weekend the editors of Church Leaders posted two articles that can easily be misconstrued as encouraging defiance of the public health measures that the State of California has implemented and which affect religious organizations. The images that were posted with these articles convey that message.

The guidance that the State of California has published includes recommendations for a temporary moratorium on choral singing, congregational singing, and corporate recitation. Such a moratorium is a reasonable precaution in light of the growing body of evidence that the COVID-19 coronavirus is also spread by airborne transmission. Singing and loud talking have been implicated in the production of aerosols that carry the virus. These two activities not only increase the number of virus particles that may be exhaled, they also increase the number of particles that may be inhaled. Both activities involve deep breathing. A temporary moratorium on choral singing, congregational singing, and corporate recitation is a reasonable application of the precautionary principle. For those who are unfamiliar with the precautionary principle, it is essentially that “when an identified threat of serious or irreversible damage to… human health exists, a lack of full scientific knowledge about the situation should not be used to delay remedial steps….” In other words, it is better to be safe than sorry.

This recommendation does not sit well with some Californian faith leaders and has caused something of an outcry. It is one of those precautionary measures which like face masks has become politicized.

One of the two articles in question stresses the importance of singing to Christian worship. While singing does play an important role in church services, what the article does not mention is that the degree of importance varies with the ecclesiastical tradition, denomination, and the type of church service. It makes a number of sweeping assumptions and can be misconstrued as maintaining that the importance of singing outweighs the importance of the health and safety of the congregation and the community.

The second article contains a quotation from the Bible which can be misinterpreted as mandating singing in church services if it is taken out of context and treated as if it establishes precedence for the practice of singing in church services, which, however, it does not. It is a descriptive passage not a prescriptive one and there is no evidence that the author of the particular gospel in which it is found intended to set a precedence for a practice with the inclusion of the passage in that gospel. It is the kind of passage that those who cherry-pick passages from Scripture to bolster their arguments are apt to choose.

These two articles, since they were posted on the weekend, will have greater visibility than they would if they had been posted on a weekday. The editors of Church Leaders do not change articles on the weekend like they do during the week.

The editors of Church Leaders might argue that they are trying to maintain a balance between the different opinions on the issue. However, the choice of the weekend to post the articles, the content of the articles, and the images posted with the articles suggests otherwise. I have been posting a blog for sixteen years and I know that these things can make a difference. As I noted earlier where denial may be involved, treating it as a difference of opinion serves to reinforce it.

I have found Church Leaders to be a source of a number of very helpful articles. Consequently, I am disappointed in its apparent failure to take a firm stand in support of public health measures needed to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. Its editors may feel that they need to take their present approach to retain the website’s readership but I believe that what they are doing is a disservice to that readership.

All websites are influencers. The extent of the influence they may exercise may vary and fluctuate. With whom they may exercise may also vary and fluctuate. However, they do exercise influence. They can exercise influence for good. Or they can exercise influence for evil. Evil is a strong word. However, some websites do exercise that kind of influence. Porn sites are one example.

Christian websites I would hope exercise influence for good. But I know that it is not always case. Christians are human beings and human beings are not infallible. Even those who have experienced the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit are still inclined to sin. As the Bible warns us, the human heart—our innermost self—is deceitful beyond measure. We deceive ourselves as well as others. Most Christian websites I believe are a mixed bag. They can be a good influence. They can also be a bad influence. I do not exclude Anglicans Ablaze or my other blogs from this assessment. I strive to be a good influence but I also recognize that I am far from perfect.

As far as the COVID-19 pandemic is concerned, I have sought to put the health and safety of my fellow Christians and my fellow human beings first. I have encouraged the application of the precautionary principle and the principle of levels of intervention in determining what measures a church should take to protect its members and its community from infection with the COVID-19 coronavirus. I have only touched on the political situation in the United States where I saw that it was interfering with efforts to contain the virus and to reduce human suffering and death.

I come from a background in which hymn singing was an important expression of one’s personal faith in Jesus Christ. Now I am not talking about hymn singing in church but hymn singing in daily life. My strongest memory of my grandparents is their hymn singing. They not only sung hymns when they went about their daily chores but also they sung them when we went anywhere in the car. When they were not singing a hymn, they were whistling or humming a hymn tune.

My grandfather had been an organist at a Wesleyan Congregationalist chapel. He played the piano and the violin as well as the organ. My grandmother was the daughter of an English school master. To set a good example for his pupils, he attended both the local Church of England parish church and the local Non-Conformist chapel with his family. My mother sang in the choir of her church as a teenager and later in life. My mother was trained as a schoolteacher in a women teachers training college operated by the Church of England. She led the daily assembly at the village school where she was head teacher. The assembly included a hymn, a Scripture reading, and prayers.

While an English schoolboy I sang hymns from the Moody & Sankey Song Book and Songs of Praise. During my teen years I sung hymns and canticles from The Hymnal 1940 at Morning Prayer and Holy Communion. When I returned to the Episcopal Church in my 30s, I joined the choir of my mother’s church as well as became a lay reader.

During the ensuing  years I was not only the senior lay reader of the church that I had helped to plant but also a worship committee chairman, liturgical planning team member, chorister, cantor, precentor, and song leader. I was involved in the music ministry of that church for the better part of the fifteen years that I was a member of the church. After I left the Episcopal Church to further pursue my interest in church planting, I was a choir member and soloist at a Methodist church plant and a praise team member and soloist at a Baptist church plant. During the last few years I have served as a song leader and soloist at a small Anglican church. I can say with all honesty that I have been immersed in church music for a good part of my life.

While I greatly value church music, choral singing, and congregational singing, I value human life even more. To my mind it is exceedingly troublesome that some Christians are taking a very legalistic view of singing, insisting that churches must have singing despite the contribution that it makes to the spread of the virus, particularly in enclosed spaces that are poorly-ventilated, spaces in which the air is recirculated rather than replaced with fresh air from outside of building. Jesus calls us to a life of sacrificial love and service, not to putting our preferences first. Despite what they may say, this is what these Christians are doing.

A temporary moratorium on choral singing, congregational singing, and corporate recitation in churches is not a total ban on singing in the Church. The Church exists outside the four walls of a building. There are many ways that Christians can sing without endangering each other or their communities. It takes a little imagination and a little creativity but it can be done. We also have the resources to do it. I encourage readers to think about how it can be done and to share their ideas with each other.

All Hallows Evening Prayer for Saturday Evening (July 11, 2020)


I just posted All Hallows Evening Prayer for Saturday Evening (July 11, 2020) on the All Hallows Murray weblog. All Hallows Evening Prayer grew out of a perceived need for a service of evening prayer for those who were unable to sing in church or to hear a choir or music ensemble in church due to the COVID-19 pandemic. All Hallows Evening Prayer uses liturgical elements and music drawn from a variety of traditions and is primarily ecumenical in its focus.

The order of service for All Hallows Evening Prayer is taken from the Anglican Church of Canada’s The Book of Alternative Services (1985).

The translation of the ancient lamp-lighting hymn Phos Hilaron, “O Gracious Light,” is taken from the Episcopal Church’s The Book of Common Prayer (1979). The setting is Timothy Sharp’ acappella choral arrangement of the hymn.

The penitential psalm, Psalm 141, is Thomas Alonso’s responsorial setting of that evening psalm, “Like Burning Incense, O Lord.” The variable psalm, Psalm 113, is Luke Mayernik’s responsorial setting of that evening psalm, “Blessed be the Name of the Lord.” The psalm prayers for both psalms are taken from the Lutheran Book of Worship Minister Desk Edition.

The Scripture reading is Luke 5: 1-11. The homily is titled “A Trusting Fisherman and an Amazing Catch of Fish.”

The Gospel Canticle is Ann Krentz’s choral arrangement of the Lutheran Book of Worship hymnal supplement, With One Voice’s translation of the Magnificat, “My Soul Proclaims Your Greatness.”

The litany comes from The Book of Common Prayer (1979); the Collect for Aid against Perils from Common Worship (2000).

The dismissal hymn is Katherine K. Davis’ “Let All Things Now Sing,” set to the traditional Welsh melody ASH GROVE.

The link to the service is: https://allhallowsmurray.blogspot.com/2020/07/all-hallows-evening-prayer-for-saturday_11.html#more

Among the purposes of posting these services is to show how how liturgical elements and music from a variety of traditions may be combined into a service of praise, proclamation, and prayer and to instruct readers in their appropriate use.

It is my hope that this service will be a blessing for you. Please feel free to share the service with anyone who may be interested.

Saturday Lagniappe: Reimagining the Church and More


Reimagining the Church

What if existing churches became a platform for microchurches? While the conversation about finding more effective ways to be a seven-day expression of the church in North America was already underway, the coronavirus outbreak forced thousands of churches to rework how they gathered and, more importantly, to rethink who they are. Read More

3 New Realities about Church Attendance, Engagement, and Devotion

Jesus didn't say 'attend me', he said follow me. Early Christians didn't attend church, they were the church. Read More

Supreme Court Delivers Two More Victories for Religious Liberty

In two rulings released this week, the Supreme Court delivered two more victories—one narrow and one broad—for religious liberty. Read More

Friday, July 10, 2020

No Singing in Church? No Problem.


By Robin G. Jordan

This article also began as a response to a comment left in the comment section of the Church Leaders’ article, “What Does Worship Look Like When There Is No Singing in Church?”  In the comment it was claimed that Scripture mandates singing in church no matter what the circumstances are. Scripture, however, is more nuanced in what it says about singing than the person who left the comment would like us to believe. It is easy to go through Scripture and cherry-pick passages that appear to support such a claim, ignoring the context and other factors that must be considered in the interpretation of these passages. That approach to Scripture is known as “proof-texting.”

One of the things that may be causing people to react negatively to the prospect of not being able to sing and even to risk singing is because it is something that they have become accustomed to doing and they do not know what to do in its place. They are not used to silence, much less to long periods of silence.

Too often worship planners have used a song as “busy work,” something to keep the congregation occupied, while the ministers do something else such as prepare the table for communion. They have filled every gap in the service with music and singing.

A number of contemporary services are little else but singing and a sermon. When the singing is omitted, all that is left is the sermon. Attendees are prompted to ask themselves, “What was the point of coming to church? I could’ve listened to the sermon at home.” They are apt to question the need for an in-person service or gathering in the first place.

Replacing the singing with instrumental music may unnecessarily lengthen the service at a time when worship planners should be shortening services in order to reduce the length of time that attendees may be exposed to airborne COVID-19 particles.

A growing body of evidence points to the airborne transmission of the COVID-19 coronavirus. Singing and loud talking have been implicated in the spread of the virus particularly in enclosed spaces that are poorly ventilated and in which the air is recirculated and not replaced with fresh air from outside of the building. In such circumstances the airborne particles can linger in the air for up to 3 hours, according to one study. The smaller the space, the greater the concentration of airborne particles, another study found. When we sing or speak loudly, we increase our rate of exhalation. If we are infected with the virus, we exhale more virus particles into the air. When we sing or speak loudly, we also breathe more deeply. We increase our rate of inhalation. If virus particles are floating in the air, we inhale more particles.

One of the early recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control was that in-person services or gatherings should initially be held outdoors. If they were held indoors, they should be held in a large, open room with the doors and windows open and ventilated by electric fans. The White House removed this recommendation from the CDC guidance that was eventually published, claiming that it was “too precise.” In the recommendation the CDC recognized the need for good ventilation in any space that a church used for its in-person services or gatherings.

The open letter which 239 scientists from 32 nations sent to the World Health Organization urging the WHO to recognize the growing body of evidence of the airborne transmission of the COVID-19 coronavirus also contained some practical advice.

--Provide sufficient and effective ventilation (supply clean outdoor air, minimize recirculating air) particularly in public buildings, workplace environments, schools, hospitals and age care homes.

--Opening both doors and windows can dramatically increase air flow rates in many buildings.

--Supplement general ventilation with airborne infection controls such as local exhaust, high efficiency air filtration, and germicidal ultraviolet lights. (These would be placed high up in the ceiling to avoid damage to people's eyes and skin).

--Avoid overcrowding, particularly in public transport and public buildings.

This advice is applicable to church sanctuaries, worship centers, and other venues where churches hold in-person services and gatherings. It is particularly applicable to settings in which many choirs rehearse—poorly-ventilated, windowless rooms in the church basement or undercroft.

Among the things that Scripture tells us is to sing and make melody in our hearts. By "heart" this passage in Paul's Letter to the Ephesians means our inner most being. In other words, we are singing and making melody without vocalizing the lyrics of the song aloud.

Paul's urging in the church at Ephesus to “sing hymns, psalms, and spiritual songs to each other” can be understood in a number of different ways. A number of these ways do not require what we consider choral singing or congregational singing.

For instance, the members of a Christian household can sing together, or one member of a Christian household can sing a hymn, psalm, or spiritual for its other members. The same household can make a video of the household singing together or a video of the household member singing and share it with the other households of their church. The video can be sent electronically to the other households or it can be played at an in-person service or gathering of their church. On Youtube I have found a number of videos of families playing musical instruments and, or singing God’s praises.

As Paul advises the church at Corinth, "When you come together, each one has a hymn, a lesson, a revelation, a tongue, or an interpretation. Let all things be done for building up." Very few churches in recent times follow that practice. A temporary moratorium on choral singing and congregational singing provides churches with an opportunity to recover the practice, using videos made by their members.

A practice that I have commended elsewhere is a practice of the early desert fathers. It is a practice that can be followed in one’s own private devotions as well as in a service of public worship. One of the monks would chant a psalm while the other monks listened to the psalm and reflected on it. Silence followed the psalm after which the monks prayed silently or aloud as the Holy Spirit moved them. The monks sung and prayed through the entire psalter in this manner. We can listen to a recording of a psalm, observe a period of silence, pray, listen to a recording of a psalm, observe a period of silence, pray, and so on. Members of the congregation might take turns recording themselves singing or reciting a psalm.

One thing that should be kept in mind in interpreting Scripture is that God exists outside of time and space as we know it. He is not a finite being like ourselves. The past, the present, and future are one to him. In interpreting a passage, we cannot rule out the possibility that God in inspiring the author of the passage was aware that those who read the passage might live in a world far different from that of the writer and took consideration of these differences in his intended application of the passage. The author of the passage may have thought in terms of singing to each other in the same room or from one room to another. God, on the other hand, knew that one day we would have the telephone, the radio, the television, the internet, and other means of communication that we cannot even imagine. Singing to each other via these means is still singing to each other.

Scripture does not enjoin us to sing without regard to our health and safety or the health and safety of others. It does not require us to play Russian Roulette with human lives as some churches are doing. In times of persecution Christians have refrained from singing lest they attract the attention of their persecutors. They have not needlessly exposed themselves to danger.

If we examine the history of singing in the Christian Church, we will discover that there have been a number of times in its history when there has been no singing at all in services of public worship or when the singing was limited to a choir or schola cantorum. In the Western Church in Medieval times only the choir sung at Mass. The priest chanted the service; the choir embellished it with their singing; and the people said their private devotions. The disappearance of congregational singing can be in part attributed to the rise of monasticism and then monastic choir.

In the Western Church congregational singing was not recovered until the time of the Reformation. How larger part it has played in a church’s services of public worship has depended upon the ecclesiastical tradition in which the church stands and the denomination to which it belongs.

In the Quaker tradition congregational singing has played no role at all. The congregation sits in silence and waits upon the Holy Spirit.

In the Anglican Church the vested choir and choral singing would play a large role due to the influence of cathedral music and the Oxford Movement.

In the Methodist Church hymn singing has played a large role. John Wesley encouraged congregational singing. He and his brother Charles Wesley translated and wrote hymns. Their theology is embodied in their hymns and John Wesley’s sermons.

While some ecclesiastical traditions use musical instruments to accompany singing; others prohibit their use. At one time the organ and the nose flute were banned from the Christian Church because they were used to accompany pagan sacrifices and entertain customers at brothels. Women’s choirs were banned as a consequence of the Arian controversy. The followers of Arius used them to lure Catholic (orthodox) Christians to their churches.

In Roman Catholic Church a common complaint made by post-Vatican II pastoral musicians was “Catholics don’t sing.” I attended a number of Roman Catholic weddings in the late twentieth century where the only people singing were the priest and the cantor.

Some Roman Catholic parishes not only sang but also sang with enthusiasm before COVID-19. A number of Roman Catholic music publishers have produced excellent hymnals. But the enthusiastic congregational singing that was heard in these Roman Catholic parishes was a relatively late development.

The Eastern Church has a long tradition of congregational singing albeit it is the liturgy that Eastern Orthodox congregations sing. An ability to sing the liturgy was a requirement for ordination to Eastern Orthodox clerical orders.

The practice of singing a “worship set” at the beginning of a service is a relatively late development, traceable to the last half of the twentieth century, to the Praise and Worship Movement and the Seeker Service Movement. Since that time this practice has spread to other Pentecostal and evangelical churches. Referring to it as the “worship time” is misleading.

Singing is a form of worship but it is not the only form of worship. Worship means to give honor to God. We can give honor to God in many different ways. Telling others of God’s wondrous deeds is one of these ways.

Jesus told the Samaritan woman at the well of Jacob that God desires true worshipers, those who will worship him in spirit and in truth. Jesus is not referring to the worship of the lips but to the worship of the heart. Heart worship is embodied in a life that honors God in every way.

Even though we may temporarily be unable to sing in church, we can still worship God. We can honor him with the way that we live, treating others as we would be treated, loving our neighbor as we would ourselves, caring for his health and safety as we would our own, loving our fellow Christians as Jesus himself loved us—with a sacrificial love in which we choose to temporarily give up singing for their health and safety. We can show our love for Jesus by keeping his word, obeying his commandments, and following his example.

We can also sing God’s praises at home or wherever we find ourselves. If we cannot sing aloud, we can sing and make melody in our hearts as Paul urged the church at Ephesus. I have found a wealth of “hymns, psalms, and spiritual songs” on Youtube and other websites and have posted the lyrics of these songs and links to mp3s and videos of them on this weblog, A Prayer Book for North America and All Hallows Murray. One of the ways that I pass time since the COVID-19 pandemic has limited my activities is to play videos of new songs, make a note of their lyrics, and then learn the new songs.

I believe that it is a mistake to compartmentalize our singing of God’s praises to church on Sundays. I believe that we should be praising God in song throughout the day and well into the night. The desire to offer God our unceasing praise and thanksgiving is what underlay the early cathedral (or popular) offices of Lauds and Vespers, and the later monastic cycle of psalmody and prayer. As Peter tells us, “you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s own people, in order that you may proclaim the mighty acts of him who called you out of darkness into his marvellous light.”

Friday's Catch: Growing as a Leader, Caring for Volunteers, and More


5-Step Process to Help You Grow as a Leader

When the level of complexity rises, and the speed of change increases, our level of growth must keep pace. Improvement is not an option if you want to lead successfully. Read More

3 Disastrous Assumptions to Make about Volunteers during and after COVID-19

Whether we’re in the middle or post phase of this pandemic, we can easily adopt the following disastrous assumptions if we aren’t careful. Read More
From the looks of it we are just in the first round of the pandemic and there are more rounds to come. Some people would like to be more optimistic but at this stage it may be better to plan for the worst case scenario and to anticipate that it may be worse than that.
Was That Worship?

We must pay close attention to what is stirring our hearts to discern whether what we are experiencing is worship or even spiritual. When the worship leader plays the first chords of our favorite praise song, are we being energized much like the natural man who hears a secular song that causes him to turn up the radio, or are we genuinely worshipping? Read More

What the Ministerial Exception Will Mean for Religious Employers

For Christians who despaired over recent Supreme Court rulings, the Our Lady of Guadalupe decision has a lot to offer. Read More

Thursday, July 09, 2020

The US COVID-19 Pandemic Response’s Missing Ingredient—Leadership!


By Robin G. Jordan

If the COVID-19 coronavirus can be spread by airborne transmission, a conclusion to which mounting evidence points, attendees at an indoor political rally like the one in Tulsa, Oklahoma, who sit for long periods of time listening to a speech are at much higher risk of an infection than attendees at an outdoor protest march, who, while shouting and chanting, are constantly on the move. While both groups may not be wearing face masks and maintaining social distancing, the attendees in the first group are in an enclosed space while the attendees in the second group are in the open.

The attendees in the first group have a high likelihood of breathing recirculated air in which the COVID-19 coronavirus in the form of airborne particles is lingering. The attendees in the second group, on the other hand, have a greater likelihood of breathing fresh air untainted by the virus as long they keep on the move. However, once the protest march stops moving, and the attendees have sustained contact with each other for a long period of time, their risk of infection goes up.

Attempts to equate indoor political rallies with outdoor protest marches and to shift the blame for an increase in COVID-19 cases attributed to indoor political rallies to outdoor protest marches reflect ignorance of these differences on the part of those making these attempts or a calculated attempt to exploit the public’s ignorance of the differences. Gathering outdoors without face masks and social distancing can be dangerous. Gathering indoors without face masks and social distancing is even more dangerous.

In pushing for the reopening of public schools President Trump and his administration is counting upon the public having become inured to the reports of skyrocketing COVID-19 cases as have the president and the administration. President Trump is not known for his high level of empathy and his public comments suggest that he was already written off the high number of casualties that his efforts to reboot the economy will cause. His motives for reopening the schools is to put the parents of school age children back to work. He is counting on an improvement in the economy increasing his chances of reelection. He is insisting that the Centers for Disease Control water down its proposed guidance for school reopenings. The health and safety of America’s school children is the least of his concerns.

Unfortunately many churches are looking to use how schools are reopened as a guide in reopening their children’s ministries. If schools are reopened prematurely and inadequate measures are taken to protect children and their teachers, the same thing is likely to happen in children’s ministries.

While Germany, Denmark, and other countries have successfully reopened schools, these countries have taken two steps that the United States has not taken. First, they have reduced overall number of new cases to low levels. Second, a number of these countries have set apart additional funds for schools. In many parts of the United States the COVID-19 pandemic is raging out of control. The federal government has hardly done anything to help schools to reopen.

For schools to reopen safely would require much more rigorous measures than the Trump administration is willing to take. It would require greatly increasing the amount of testing, limiting the size of classes, reducing the length of the school day, requiring face mask wearing and social distancing, and retrofitting schools with ventilation systems that provided classrooms and common spaces with fresh air from outside of the school building rather than recirculating existing air. A number of the new schools have been built with no windows or windows that do not open. These are just a few of the measures that school districts would need to take to protect students and teachers and the larger community.

The Trump administration has on several occasions weakened the CDC’s recommendations to serve its political purposes. President Trump has urged both states and churches to prematurely open. He is now urging schools to do the same thing. In the meantime the United States is experiencing surges in COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths. A number of churches have become the epicenter of clusters of new cases.

In Florida an Assembly of God church held a youth event with up to 100 teens in attendance. One of those teens who had a compromised immunity system subsequently died, a victim of the COVID-19 coronavirus.

When the US response to the COVID-19 pandemic is compared with that of other countries, the United States falls in the category of countries that have made least adequate response to the pandemic. Its poor response can be attributed to a lack of leadership at the national level and inconsistent leadership at the state and county levels. For states, counties, businesses, and churches the absence of credible guidance, based upon the latest scientific findings, has been more than a headache. It has been a nightmare.

Economic recovery is not going to bring back the lives that the COVID-19 coronavirus has taken. It is not going to ameliorate the suffering that the virus has caused. The virus is not going away any time soon and will be with us for the foreseeable future. Any economic recovery is likely to be short-lived if strong measures to contain the virus are not implemented.

The United States needs dependable leadership at the national level and more consistent leadership at the state and county level if it is to pull through this pandemic. In some cases, meeting this need will require a change of leadership; in other cases, it will require existing leadership taking the pandemic with far more seriousness than that leadership has to date.

Churches need trustworthy guidance to make the important decisions related to their worship and their life, which they need to make. We do not need to hear more stories of churches that followed what guidance they were given, only to discover it was not adequate enough to protect their congregations and their communities from the COVID-19 coronavirus.

Readers may disagree with this analysis. That is their choice. However, they need understand that making such a choice is not without ramifications. All our choices have consequences and they may be consequences that we do not welcome and even may regret.