By Robin G. Jordan
“Common Liturgy” is a term with multiple meanings. It can
refer to the collection of rites and services typically found in a modern
Anglican service book. It can also just refer to a particular liturgy—the
service that the 1662 Book of Common Prayer refers to as “The Order for the
Administration of the Lord’s Supper or Holy Communion” or simply “The
Communion.”
The Merriam Webster Dictionary defines “common” as “belonging
to or shared by two or more individuals or groups.” It defines “liturgy” as “a
fixed set of ceremonies, words, etc., that are used during public worship in a
religion,” “ eucharistic rite,” “or “ a rite or body of rites prescribed for
public worship” The English word “liturgy” is a conflation of two Greek words
and literally means “the work of the people.” It related to English word
“laity,” which is derived from one of these Greek words—laos.
Among the implications of these definitions of the term
“common liturgy” is that it must, whether a rite or body of rites, be owned and
accepted by the entire denomination. It cannot be a rite or body of rites
preferred by one ecclesiastical party in the denomination, embodying its
theology, and imposed upon the other groups in the denomination. In that case,
while it may be the official liturgy of the denomination, it is by no means the
common liturgy of the denomination. It must enjoy widespread ownership and
acceptance.
This challenge is one of several major challenges that face a working group commissioned
to develop rites and services for a denomination. It is also one of the reasons
that such a working group should include representatives from all schools of
thought and interested groups in the denomination and separate panels
representing each such school and group should be established to review each
draft, provide feedback, propose changes, and even demand a new draft.
The ideas of denominational leaders for a particular rite or
service should not be given preference over any other ideas. Additional
safeguards should be implemented to keep any one group or individual from
unduly influencing the process for developing rites and services for the
denomination.
One of the weaknesses of the ACNA process for developing a
liturgy and a Prayer Book is that the Prayer Book and Common Liturgy Task Force
is too willing to incorporate the suggestions of individual bishops which in
all likelihood represent the personal preferences of the bishop in question and
do not take into consideration how these suggested changes affect the doctrine
of the rite or the rite’s usability on the North American mission field.
The development of a common liturgy can be even more
challenging when the schools of thought in the denomination hold sharply divergent
views on key issues such as the number of sacraments and the presence of Christ
in the eucharistic species.
When faced with this particular challenge, a basic approach
is to develop a rite or rites that are plain vanilla. Each rite is the simplest,
most basic version of the rite possible—no adornments, no special features.
Texts or wording that are controversial or have historically
divided members of the denomination or the global community of churches of
which it is part are avoided. Texts or wording that are deliberately ambivalent
and open to multiple interpretations may be used in their place.
Any embellishments are not printed in the rite itself but in
a section at the end of the rite and are purely optional. Additional notes for
the conduct of the rite are printed in this section.
It may also be necessary to provide alternate texts and
alternate rites, give clergy permission to make minor alterations in the rites
and services, and even to permit judicatories to develop their own rites and
services. The Anglican Church of Australia has adopted all three approaches.
But is the result a common liturgy? In reality it may be the
closest thing to a common liturgy that the Anglican Church of Australia in its
particular circumstances can achieve. Indeed the Anglican Church of Australia
has three common liturgies—The Book of Common Prayer (1662), An Australian Prayer Book (1978), and A Prayer Book for Australia (1995). The last two books are authorized for use together
with the Prayer Book. The Anglican Church of Australia is a loose federation of
formerly independent dioceses with separate ties to the Church of England. (The
constitution of the Anglican Church of Australia would have been a good model
for the constitution of the Anglican Church in North America.)
Of the 23 dioceses forming the Anglican Church of
Australia’s five province and one extraterritorial diocese, only two—Ballarat
and Sydney—have produced liturgies of their own. The Ballarat liturgy was
produced during the episcopate of Anglo-Catholic Bishop David Silk who retired
in 2003. Silk did not consider the three books Catholic enough. In 2010 Silk
announced his intention to convert to Roman Catholicism. I was not able to
ascertain whether Ballarat has continued to use this liturgy since Silk’s
retirement.
Sydney adopted Common Prayer: Resources for Gospel Shaped Gatherings, the latest revision of its liturgy in 2012. Common Prayer: Resources for Gospel Shaped Gatherings replaced Sunday Services: A Contemporary Liturgical Resource, adopted in 2001.
Sydney’s Diocesan Doctrinal Commission took issue with the doctrine of A Prayer Book for Australia, resulting in the development of Sunday Services: A Contemporary Liturgical Resource.
How the Anglican Church of Australia has sought to meet the
need for a common liturgy in that church is preferable to what the Anglican
Church in North America is attempting to do—impose Procrustean standards on the
worship of the churches in the denomination, forcing it into the same mold both
liturgically and doctrinally irrespective of the particular circumstances of a
church or its theological leanings.
Another challenge facing a working group tasked with
developing a common liturgy for a denomination is what material it should use
from existing service books and which books. Top considerations in the choice
of this material should be the elegance of its language, its biblical orthodox
and theological soundness, its suitability for twenty-first century
congregations and twenty-first century contexts, and the need to strike a
balance between the old and the new, the familiar and the unfamiliar.
Evaluations of this material should be weighed against the
evaluators’ past history and their liturgical and doctrinal proclivities
evidenced in this history. In other words, the evaluation of the material
should itself be evaluated. Too often criticism of a particular liturgy or a
particular liturgical element boils down to it not fitting the critic’s notions
of an ideal liturgy or liturgical element.
A case in point may be Arnold Klukas’ “Contemporary Anglican
Prayer Books 1928-2009,” in which he examines the divergence of the more recent
Anglican service books from “classical standards.” Klukas is a Professor of
Liturgy at Nashotah House and a member of the ACNA Prayer Book and Common
Liturgy Task Force. From what I gather he has played a leading role in the
rites and services that task force has drafted to date. An article published in
2001 revealed that he displayed a marked preference for the older liturgies in
his parish ministry. This preference may color his evaluation of more recent
Anglican service books and their contents.
What is noticeable about the rites and services that the
ACNA Prayer Book and Common Liturgy Task Force has so far produced is they do
not appear to stray far from the source books listed in “The Unmaking of the Classical Anglican Prayer Book.” The ordinal, for example, is an adaptation of
the 1928 Ordinal, adopting rubrics from the 1549 Ordinal and features from the
1979 Ordinal. They appear to do very little borrowing from the larger corpus of
Anglican service books, old and new. One might say that they suffer from
liturgical inbreeding.
The ACNA Prayer Book and Common Liturgy Task Force has not
attempted to integrate the rites and services of that denomination into the
broader stream of Anglican liturgies. The task force has taken little advantage
of the wealth of liturgical material produced in and outside of North America
in the twentieth century and during the past fourteen years.
The rites and services that the ACNA Prayer Book and Common
Liturgy Task Force has so far produced are classifiable as representing a Anglo-Catholic
offshoot of the American Prayer Book tradition but lacking the comprehensiveness
of the 1789 and 1892 American Prayer Books, which permitted the omission of the
signing of the cross on the forehead of the newly baptized and provided
alternative wording at the laying on of hands in the ordination of a presbyter,
modest concessions to evangelical sensibilities. Rather the task force has
incorporated into these services and rites doctrine and liturgical usages historically
associated with an advanced form of Anglo-Catholicism. The only thing missing
is the invocation and veneration of the Blessed Virgin Mary and the saints.
What is also noticeable about these rites and services is
that they incorporate very little if any material from the Canadian Prayer Book
tradition or the Reformed Episcopal Prayer Book tradition. Both traditions at
one time displayed a strong evangelical influence. The Reformed Episcopal
Church has no representative on the ACNA Prayer Book and Common Liturgy Task
Force and the Anglican Network in Canada’s representative is an Anglo-Catholic.
A third challenge that faces a working group entrusted with
the development of a common liturgy for a denomination is the context in which
the rite or body of rites will be used. The kind of service book that an older
denomination with a large number of established churches and a small number of
new churches will need will be entirely different from the kind of service book
a young denomination with a small number of established churches and a large
number of new churches will need.
In the twentieth century we saw the emergence of the house
church movement and the formation of house church networks. In the twenty-first
century we are seeing the emergence of the mobile church movement—"church in a
box." New churches are not the only churches meeting in a wide-range of
unconventional settings. Established churches are selling their buildings and
renting facilities. They have found that becoming a mobile church has
transformed their ministry. They have not only expanded their population base
and seen corresponding increases in worship attendance, church membership, and
giving but also have increased their impact upon the community.
The context of worship has changed dramatically from what it
was in the mid-twentieth century. Yet the ACNA Prayer Book and Common Liturgy
Task Force is producing rites and services not for the twenty-first century
Church but for the mid-twentieth century Church. Worship context does not
appear to enter into its thinking. The task force is developing rites and
services for a Church that is largely a product of its imagination.
Worship context, however, is a critical factor in the
twenty-first century. Rising real estate values, a slow economy, and tighter
zoning laws increase the likelihood that a large number of congregations may
not own a building and worship in a conventional setting. These are the
realities of the North American mission field. A number of congregations have
bought or constructed buildings that they could not afford and have lost these
buildings to bank foreclosure. The best some congregations can hope for is to
rent a large house or storefront and modify it into a worship center provided
their landlord permits such modification and they do not run afoul of local
zoning laws.
In upcoming articles in this series we will look at how a
working group commissioned with the development of a common liturgy for a
denomination can meet this challenge and other challenges that it faces.
An Australian Prayer Book (1978) is online in PDF format. Copyright information is available at Broughton Publishing.“Members of the Anglican Communion and churches of other denominations are welcome to make print or electronic copies of An Australian Prayer Book, in whole or in part for liturgical or church purposes, free of charge provided they are attentive to the integrity of the text, that copies are not made available for sale and that the source of the extract is appropriately acknowledged e.g. title and page number." A Prayer Book for Australia Full Edition (1995) is available from Australian Church Resources. Amazon no longer stocks the soft-cover edition. Copyright information is also available from Broughton Publishing.
Photo: catholicandreformed.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment