In Alabama on December 12—a week from today—large numbers of evangelicals will cast their vote for Roy Moore, many of whose defenders do not even bother to deny that he is a serial sexual molester of underage girls. The evidence against Moore is so overwhelming that if evangelicals are going to posit the existence of a vast conspiracy to frame him, they owe Dan Brown an apology.
How did we get to this point? That’s a question with a long answer, but a short answer might be: by neglecting our eschatology—and the lesson of Chuck Colson. Read More
1 comment:
"The evidence against Moore is overwhelming." With respect, do you know of some evidence which the rest of us do not have? I am not a Moore supporter - I am a Jones detractor. On what basis do you deny the possibility that Moore could be innocent? As one whose career was destroyed by innuendo, slander, and false witness I find my self - albeit reluctantly - giving Moore the benefit of the doubt. Jones is blantantly pro-death, pro LGBT agenda, pro Common Cause, and has even attempted to register felons in order to glean votes. He is certainly more likely to vote to impeach Trump than Moore - and that is already the stated Democrat/RINO agenda. No doubt, Potaphar's wife had many supporters at court who backed her story. Certainly glad I never signed anybody's yearbook!
Post a Comment